Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[msys2] Bump version and support two profiles approach. #4286
[msys2] Bump version and support two profiles approach. #4286
Changes from all commits
29d108c
c5c9ac6
1135419
5afbeee
18605c3
83e85c9
996cfe6
e313310
d771a11
0048efa
e774845
4f85154
018f193
4d19222
a7b4684
68e2921
9b8ac9c
e4078a5
ad082f3
f990aa9
827d877
8b4354c
57c2861
952ec71
55ca40f
2bd48af
a27754b
3648765
471d40e
364fe93
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this required since the version was removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you don't remove it, you will receive
zero packages generated
error for version 20161025but right now we're not sure these versions make sense at all, as we upgrade them right away, so effectively all the versions are the same
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually we are waiting for a decision regarding rolling releases. :-) cc @jgsogo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can this be added to the
conandata.yml
?The hooks accept the following.
(Not that I find it nice)
You can also use it to introduce
x86
andx86_64
keys for the main tarball (by also using the key insha256
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe. I just don't see any real advantage. The keys only needed for old packages, there is also no difference x86/x86_64.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand re the keys.
About
x86/x86_64
, the recipe currently differentiates between these 2 archs by their index in a list.Look at the
android-ndk
conandata.yml
how the different operatings systems are handled.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test can be dropped, it is already checked for in
validate
.