Open62541 - Allow more clang versions

[Kischy]

Specify library name and version: open62541/1.3.8

Allows a broader variety of clang compiler versions. See issue #20579

---

• I've read the contributing guidelines.
• I've used a recent Conan client version close to the currently deployed.
• I've tried at least one configuration locally with the conan-center hook activated.

[Kischy]

@Ahajha Will this be squash merged? The history is not needed imho.

[Ahajha]

@Ahajha Will this be squash merged? The history is not needed imho.

Yes, the commits are squashed.

[Kischy]

@Ahajha Who do I need to ask for a second review?

[Ahajha]

@Ahajha Who do I need to ask for a second review?

Hopefully Ruben will get to it soon, I think he's been a bit busy recently. Also my approval "doesn't count" so to speak, I don't have write access.

[Kischy]

@Ahajha Who do I need to ask for a second review?

Hopefully Ruben will get to it soon, I think he's been a bit busy recently. Also my approval "doesn't count" so to speak, I don't have write access.

Ok, so I still need a second person with write access to review this...

[Kischy]

@Ahajha, @RubenRBS Do you have the possibility to link issue #20579 to this PR? I do not have the rights to do this.

[Kischy]

@RubenRBS Can I help you in any way to get the reviews faster? :)

[Kischy]

@Ahajha Hmm, nothing happening here. How can I motivate someone with write access to review this PR?

[conan-center-bot]

Conan v1 pipeline ✔️

All green in build 20 (d8515d7692f569e95857100400c69723cdb06b42):

• open62541/1.3.8:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• open62541/1.1.6:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• open62541/1.2.6:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• open62541/1.0.6:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

---

Conan v2 pipeline ✔️

Note: Conan v2 builds are now mandatory. Please read our discussion about it.

All green in build 20 (d8515d7692f569e95857100400c69723cdb06b42):

• open62541/1.0.6:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• open62541/1.2.6:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• open62541/1.1.6:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• open62541/1.3.8:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

[Ahajha]

@Ahajha Hmm, nothing happening here. How can I motivate someone with write access to review this PR?

Tbh, I wish I knew. I've had a PR sitting for a few weeks now, struggling to get a review myself.

[Kischy]

@Ahajha Hmm, nothing happening here. How can I motivate someone with write access to review this PR?

Tbh, I wish I knew. I've had a PR sitting for a few weeks now, struggling to get a review myself.

Arg... that's depressing. This is blocking other work for me. If this takes so long I will have to find a different solution. 😢

[Kischy]

@Ahajha Which one is your PR? I will try something that might make me quite unpopular...

[Ahajha]

Please don't. Regardless, it's a weekend. On Monday I'll try to ask in Slack (Cpplang) for some reviews.

[Kischy]

Please don't. Regardless, it's a weekend. On Monday I'll try to ask in Slack (Cpplang) for some reviews.

Ok , then I wait. Thank you.

[uilianries]

LGTM

[AbrilRBS]

Thanks a lot for your patience, after looking into the initial reasons of why the version limits, this seems to be ok :)

[AbrilRBS]

Please don't. Regardless, it's a weekend. On Monday I'll try to ask in Slack (Cpplang) for some reviews.

Ok , then I wait. Thank you.

Thank you for your understanding @Kischy @Ahajha

[Kischy]

@RubenRBS @uilianries @Ahajha Thank you so much :)