Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ScalaPB: various fix and improves #1027

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2020
Merged

Conversation

chikei
Copy link
Contributor

@chikei chikei commented Dec 3, 2020

Copy link
Member

@lefou lefou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. I added one question below.

Also, I just recognized that we have a commented-out test case for ScalaPB. Could you please check if this test works for you locally? I'm pretty sure we can handle non-abilities of the CI env better than commenting out. (Can't tell if there a equivalent to scalatest's assume in utest). I could imagine that this test will work on Github Actions as-is.

Comment on lines +37 to +39
override def scalaPBAdditionalArgs = T{Seq(
"--additional-test=..."
)}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the point of changing this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was written from the version before last scalapb pr and thinking "additional-test" might easier for other people to reasoning and not specific for zio, not something matters in term of code execution.

@chikei
Copy link
Contributor Author

chikei commented Dec 8, 2020

Ya, I've verified the calledDirectly test works locally before push.

@lefou lefou merged commit 721fe57 into com-lihaoyi:master Dec 8, 2020
@lefou lefou added this to the after 0.9.3 milestone Dec 8, 2020
@lefou
Copy link
Member

lefou commented Dec 8, 2020

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants