Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

L1 P2GT region cut checks and fixing menu config #47204

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 5, 2025

Conversation

artlbv
Copy link
Contributor

@artlbv artlbv commented Jan 29, 2025

PR description:

This is a follow up to #46489 addressing #47194

The issue appeared when the number of eta regions (bounds) did not match e.g. the number of pt region thresholds.

  1. An exception has been introduced in the P2GT condition parser when the cut number does not match the number of eta regions as @HaarigerHarald suggested
  2. Fixed menu conditions where the number of pt and eta regions did not match (should not affect trigger results)

PR validation:

In CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X_2025-01-27-2300 workflow 29634.78 ran fine with the default L1P2GT:step1_2024 and the step1_2024_explicitSeeds menu.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 29, 2025

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @artlbv for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • L1Trigger/Configuration (l1)
  • L1Trigger/Phase2L1GT (l1, upgrade)

@Moanwar, @aloeliger, @cmsbuild, @epalencia, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @mmusich this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jan 29, 2025

type bug-fix

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jan 29, 2025

test parameters:

  • relvals_opt = --what upgrade
  • workflows = 24834.0, 29634.0, 24834.911, 29634.78

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jan 29, 2025

please test for CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X

@artlbv
Copy link
Contributor Author

artlbv commented Jan 30, 2025

thanks for launching the tests @mmusich , but the bot failed with "Unable to find CMSSW IB for CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X."
@smuzaffar @iarspider do you know why this could fail?

@iarspider
Copy link
Contributor

please test for CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X/el8_amd64_gcc12

@iarspider
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for launching the tests @mmusich , but the bot failed with "Unable to find CMSSW IB for CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X." @smuzaffar @iarspider do you know why this could fail?

If IB type is built for multiple archtectures (e.g. ASAN is now built for el8_amd64_gcc12 and el8_amd64_gcc13), you need to explicitly specify the architecture.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jan 30, 2025

If IB type is built for multiple archtectures (e.g. ASAN is now built for el8_amd64_gcc12 and el8_amd64_gcc13), you need to explicitly specify the architecture.

looks like this was not a requirement in the past.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 3, 2025

Pull request #47204 was updated. @Moanwar, @aloeliger, @cmsbuild, @epalencia, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again.

@artlbv
Copy link
Contributor Author

artlbv commented Feb 3, 2025

@smuzaffar @iarspider is it possible now to test with the ASAN build?
cms-sw/cms-bot#2425 seems merged

@aloeliger
Copy link
Contributor

Please test

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test for CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X

@smuzaffar @iarspider is it possible now to test with the ASAN build? cms-sw/cms-bot#2425 seems merged

yes it is, I just requested the asan tests

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 3, 2025

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23fe54/44158/summary.html
COMMIT: 7e19b53
CMSSW: CMSSW_15_0_X_2025-02-03-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/47204/44158/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 3, 2025

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23fe54/44160/summary.html
COMMIT: 7e19b53
CMSSW: CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X_2025-01-31-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/47204/44160/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

  • 145.301145.301_RunDisplacedJet2024E/step3_RunDisplacedJet2024E.log

@aloeliger
Copy link
Contributor

The relval test is largely complaining about L1TMuonCPPFDigiProducer.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Feb 4, 2025

The relval test is largely complaining about L1TMuonCPPFDigiProducer.

see #47204 (comment)

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Feb 4, 2025

is it possible now to test with the ASAN build?

I am not sure why testing with ASAN was requested again, given the analysis given already at #47204 (comment). To make the test fail again?

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Feb 4, 2025

urgent

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the urgent label Feb 4, 2025
@aloeliger
Copy link
Contributor

+l1

This is fine from my side

@aloeliger
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 any comments?

@Moanwar
Copy link
Contributor

Moanwar commented Feb 5, 2025

+Upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 5, 2025

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit d8f5228 into cms-sw:master Feb 5, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants