-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
L1 P2GT region cut checks and fixing menu config #47204
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-47204/43475 |
A new Pull Request was created by @artlbv for master. It involves the following packages:
@Moanwar, @aloeliger, @cmsbuild, @epalencia, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
type bug-fix |
test parameters:
|
please test for CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X |
thanks for launching the tests @mmusich , but the bot failed with "Unable to find CMSSW IB for CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X." |
please test for CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X/el8_amd64_gcc12 |
If IB type is built for multiple archtectures (e.g. ASAN is now built for el8_amd64_gcc12 and el8_amd64_gcc13), you need to explicitly specify the architecture. |
looks like this was not a requirement in the past. |
Pull request #47204 was updated. @Moanwar, @aloeliger, @cmsbuild, @epalencia, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again. |
@smuzaffar @iarspider is it possible now to test with the ASAN build? |
Please test |
please test for CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X
yes it is, I just requested the asan tests |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals
|
The relval test is largely complaining about |
see #47204 (comment) |
I am not sure why testing with ASAN was requested again, given the analysis given already at #47204 (comment). To make the test fail again? |
urgent |
+l1 This is fine from my side |
@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 any comments? |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This is a follow up to #46489 addressing #47194
The issue appeared when the number of eta regions (bounds) did not match e.g. the number of pt region thresholds.
PR validation:
In
CMSSW_15_0_ASAN_X_2025-01-27-2300
workflow29634.78
ran fine with the defaultL1P2GT:step1_2024
and thestep1_2024_explicitSeeds
menu.