-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Addition of single iteration Patatrack and LST HLT configurations and workflows #46828
Addition of single iteration Patatrack and LST HLT configurations and workflows #46828
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46828/42842
|
A new Pull Request was created by @VourMa for master. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @Martin-Grunewald, @Moanwar, @antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @DickyChant, @fabiocos, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @mmusich, @rappoccio, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
I am not sure whether I should use the procModifiers introduced in this PR always with the |
test parameters:
|
HLTrigger/Configuration/python/HLT_75e33/modules/hltHighPtTripletStepSeedTracksLST_cfi.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
HLTrigger/Configuration/python/HLT_75e33/modules/hltInitialStepSeedTracksLST_cfi.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
HLTrigger/Configuration/python/HLT_75e33/modules/hltPixelSeedInputLST_cfi.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
HLTrigger/Configuration/python/HLT_75e33/eventsetup/hltESPModulesDevLST_cfi.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
HLTrigger/Configuration/python/HLT_75e33/sequences/HLTHighPtTripletStepSequence_cfi.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46828/42846
|
Pull request #46828 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @Martin-Grunewald, @Moanwar, @antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @DickyChant, @fabiocos, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @mmusich, @rappoccio, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
My point was having about a specific procModifier (e.g. |
the point here is that the legacy pixel tracking should not really exist in phase-2 (I think that's beyond discussion). I don't see the point of having a |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 60KB to repository
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+hlt
|
+1 |
+pdmv |
@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 can you take a look? |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description
This is a procModifier-based implementation of LST in HLT. It reuses the
trackingLST
procModifier to enable LST track building, and it introduces a new one,seedingLST
, which is not too useful for the HLT currently but it may become useful also for the offline setup in the near future.Another modifier,
singleIterPatatrack
is introduced and it allows HLT to run only one iteration of tracking based on Patatrack pixel seeds. It works both with CKF and with LST building (when combined with the procModifier above).Three new variations of the HLT timing workflow are also added (single iteration, single iteration LST, LST).
The most important results have been summarized in this presentation.
Instructions on how to run
FYI @slava77 @rovere @lguzzi