-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed energy of R-Hadron cloud in energy deposit model #46728
Conversation
A 2015 commit to FullModelHadronicProcess.cc (0f7fe9f#diff-d97c0182cf0b0204534930064c29ace096341c2b2a33ede9d1f1aac75be22d91) introduced a bug to the energy deposit model. This bug incorrectly deposited energy values close to the BSM particles mass into the simulated detector.
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46728/42698 |
A new Pull Request was created by @ctdax for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
Let us test this PR |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@ctdax , I think that it is OK to merge this fix, further fixes/improvements may be in the next PRs. One thing I would recommend: please, substitute "Work in progress! Updated to" in the title by "Fixed energy of R-Hadron cloud in ". Edition of the title or description will no trigger new tests, precise title is usefull in the long term. Depending on what Run period is considered for the analysis, backport(s) will be needed. If you foresee extra PRs on this subject, the backport may be the sum of all done for the master. If you are not sure, better to backport what is proposed in this PR now and do not postpond this. |
+1 |
I went ahead and took care of the title change. Please let me know if I did not follow the suggestion correctly. |
PR description:
A 2015 commit to FullModelHadronicProcess.cc introduced a bug to the energy deposit model. This bug incorrectly deposited energy values close to the BSM particles mass into the simulated detector. This merge request reverts the energy deposit model to a previously working version from 2015. This is a work in progress, additional changes are expected to be made. Here are slides given to the EXO general group on the topic from November 19th, 2024
PR validation:
scram b runtests use-ibeos
completed successfully.runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos
completed successfully without any failrues.Below is a comparison of 10,000 identically seeded simulated energy deposits in the ECAL barrel with and without the bug.