Removing Muon POG DQM sequence from express, with fix for CSC monitoring

[rseidita]

PR description:

Moving cscMonitor module from muonMonitors to cscSources, enabling the removal of the DQMOfflineMUO DQM sequence from Express without loosing the CSCOfflineMonitor folder.

PR validation:

Validated using the following drivers:

cmsDriver.py step2 --conditions 140X_dataRun3_Express_v3 --data --datatier RECO,DQMIO --era Run3_2024 --eventcontent RECO,DQM --filein /store/express/Run2024I/ExpressPhysics/FEVT/Express-v2/000/386/814/00000/fa7e3b68-1bb0-4173-a047-271497361731.root --fileout file:step2_modified.root --nStreams 2 --nThreads 8 --no_exec --number 10 --process RECODQM --python_filename step2_modified_cfg.py --scenario pp --step RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,DQM:@standardDQMExpress

cmsDriver.py step3 --conditions 140X_dataRun3_Express_v3 --data --era Run3_2024 --filein file:step2_modified_inDQM.root --fileout file:step3_modified.root --filetype DQM --nStreams 2 --no_exec --number 10 --python_filename step_3_modified_cfg.py --scenario pp --step HARVESTING:@standardDQMExpress

Plus RunTheMatrix.py.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Will backport to 14_1_X

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46473/42331

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:
  • File DQMOffline/Configuration/python/DQMOffline_cff.py modified in PR(s): Tau DQM miniAOD validation for DATA #44029

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @rseidita for master.

It involves the following packages:

• DQM/CSCMonitorModule (dqm)
• DQMOffline/Configuration (dqm)
• DQMOffline/Muon (dqm)

@antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Fedespring, @HuguesBrun, @abbiendi, @barvic, @bellan, @calderona, @cericeci, @jhgoh, @ptcox, @rociovilar, @threus, @trocino this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[antoniovagnerini]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dcbd5c/42340/summary.html
COMMIT: b7672dc
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-21-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/46473/42340/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

• @SanghyunKo Adding unbiased superclusters to miniAOD and EGM nano #46423
• @trackreco Tracking validation updates/improvements #46324

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dcbd5c/42340/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dcbd5c/42340/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 2 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 460 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 46
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3566331
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 84286
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3482025
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 45 files compared)
• Checked 201 log files, 171 edm output root files, 46 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[antoniovagnerini]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[mandrenguyen]

+1