-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
migrate calotowers creation code to use EcalPFRecHitThresholds
#45803
migrate calotowers creation code to use EcalPFRecHitThresholds
#45803
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45803/41542
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Milestone for this pull request has been moved to CMSSW_14_2_X. Please open a backport if it should also go in to CMSSW_14_1_X. |
For the record, some discussion is included in CMSHLT-3320 |
beb3a90
to
4b949e2
Compare
4b949e2
to
979e229
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45803/41754
|
Pull request #45803 was updated. @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please check and sign again. |
type hlt-integration
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR the ECAL equivalent of #43329.
While our final aim is to fully deprecate calotowers, there is no clear ETA for that. Several POGs still use calotowers, specially at HLT. So, to ensure that correct HCAL thresholds are used in making calotowers, the safest way is to use the thresholds from GT.
That is what is done in this PR.
This PR was sparked by the observation that at the HLT we are using the following configuration:
which looks exceedingly low given that 0.3 GeV threshold in EE for all crystals is too small threshold to mitigate the noise in EE.
There are crystals in EE where the threshold is order of 10 GeV (reaching up to ~50 GeV or maybe even higher these days).
Indeed inspecting the last IOV of the
EcalPFRecHitThresholdsRcd
associated tag at HLT,I see rather large thresholds especially in EE:
This PR allows to change the logic of the code to use the
EcalPFRecHitThresholds
from GT instead of the fixed values.PR validation:
Validation was purely technical:
runTheMatrix.py - l limited --ibeos
.Physics implications should be checked by the relevant POGs.
EDIT: In the last push the new parameter
EcalRecHitThresh
is set to false, such that this PR is technically a no-op.If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
N/A