Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add hlt (HLT) label to Phase-2 HLT modules (sequences) #45636

Merged

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Aug 5, 2024

PR description:

The goal of this PR is to package together the renaming of the HLT module and sequences labels in the HLT phase-2 menu (kindly provided by @AuroraPerego in AuroraPerego@226b557, see discussion at #45500 (comment)) with the necessary updates of the Trigger DQM and Validation sequences configurations consuming said products in order to stay in synch with it (that I provide in mmusich@24f4756)

PR validation:

None, will rely on the bot tests.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

This PR is not a backport and it should not be backported.


I open this PR in draft mode as I am not sure that I have caught all the products consumed downstream that need to be renamed in the configuration.
I would like to request feedback to:

  • @cms-sw/tracking-pog-l2 @elusian @lguzzi @cms-sw/trk-dpg-l2 about the new naming of the collections used for tracker local reconstruction / tracking / vertexing
  • @cms-sw/pf-l2 @waredjeb @jsamudio about the naming of the PF modules used in the HLT.
  • @cms-sw/hgcal-dpg-l2 if there is any DQM / validation module monitoring HGCal products that need to be taken care of.

Cc: @rovere @SohamBhattacharya @VourMa

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2024

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2024

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQMOffline/Trigger (dqm)
  • HLTrigger/Configuration (hlt)
  • Validation/RecoTrack (dqm)
  • Validation/RecoVertex (dqm)

@Martin-Grunewald, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @mmusich, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Fedespring, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @HuguesBrun, @JanFSchulte, @Martin-Grunewald, @ReyerBand, @SohamBhattacharya, @VinInn, @VourMa, @argiro, @cericeci, @dgulhan, @felicepantaleo, @jhgoh, @missirol, @mmusich, @mtosi, @rchatter, @rociovilar, @rovere, @silviodonato, @thomreis, @trocino, @venturia, @wang0jin, @wmtford this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Aug 5, 2024

@cmsbuild, please test

PFClusters = cms.InputTag("particleFlowClusterHGCalFromTICLUnseeded"),
PFSuperClusterCollectionBarrel = cms.string('particleFlowSuperClusterECALBarrel'),
PFClusters = cms.InputTag("hltParticleFlowClusterHGCalFromTICLUnseeded"),
PFSuperClusterCollectionBarrel = cms.string('hltParticleFlowSuperClusterECALBarrel'),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe I am missing something, but also according to the other EDProducers, shouldn't this be

Suggested change
PFSuperClusterCollectionBarrel = cms.string('hltParticleFlowSuperClusterECALBarrel'),
PFSuperClusterCollectionBarrel = cms.string('particleFlowSuperClusterECALBarrel'),

?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I can tell, I agree with @waredjeb regarding consistency.
On the other hand, this product (I mean the barrel one created by this HGCal-labelled module) is never consumed. So any name would do w/o crashes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank @rovere for the check.

On the other hand, this product (I mean the barrel one created by this HGCal-labelled module) is never consumed. So any name would do w/o crashes.

I would propose to go ahead with the PR as is now to avoid re-triggering a lot of signatures and then fix this immediately after, if people agree.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed at #45768. Let me know if you spot other problems.

@waredjeb
Copy link
Contributor

waredjeb commented Aug 5, 2024

Hi @mmusich thanks a lot!
I think I might have to go through it couple of times!

For what concerns TICL/HGCAL, I think we also need to modify the RecoHGCal Event content https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/RecoHGCal/Configuration/python/RecoHGCal_EventContent_cff.py adding the new HLT collections to FEVTDEBUGHLToutput

We can make a commit on top of this PR such that you can just cherry-pick it

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Aug 5, 2024

I think we also need to modify the RecoHGCal Event content .

Good point! The same holds true for the tracking products .

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2024

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 220KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ea66c8/40760/summary.html
COMMIT: 24f4756
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-08-04-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/45636/40760/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 305 lines to the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 908 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 46
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3524886
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5236
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3519628
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 7.322999999999999 KiB( 45 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 1.371 KiB HLT/Vertexing
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): -0.326 KiB HLT/Tracking
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 29696.0,... ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 200 log files, 170 edm output root files, 46 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@AuroraPerego
Copy link
Contributor

We can make a commit on top of this PR such that you can just cherry-pick it

Hi @mmusich, I think you can use this commit. I've checked that the collections are saved in the event content. Let us know if it works :)

- add `hlt` to modules
- add `HLT` to sequences
@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Aug 8, 2024

+Upgrade

@tjavaid
Copy link

tjavaid commented Aug 13, 2024

+1

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Aug 19, 2024

+hlt

@antoniovilela
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit fafad05 into cms-sw:master Aug 20, 2024
11 checks passed
@mmusich mmusich deleted the mm_dev_renameCollection_in_HLT_phase2_menu branch August 20, 2024 14:08
mmusich added a commit to mmusich/cmssw that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2024
mmusich added a commit to mmusich/cmssw that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2024
cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2024
youngwan-kim pushed a commit to youngwan-kim/cmssw that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
jyoti299 pushed a commit to jyoti299/cmssw that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants