Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for CLANG_X+CPP20 #45428

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

iarspider
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

See cms-sw/cmsdist#9288.

  • Move definition of LHERunInfo::Process comparision operators before usage link
  • Add include of Track.h to make class fully defined link

PR validation:

Bot tests

@iarspider
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 11, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @iarspider for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • GeneratorInterface/LHEInterface (generators)
  • RecoTracker/FinalTrackSelectors (reconstruction)

@GurpreetSinghChahal, @SiewYan, @alberto-sanchez, @bbilin, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @menglu21, @mkirsano can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @VinInn, @VourMa, @alberto-sanchez, @dgulhan, @felicepantaleo, @gpetruc, @missirol, @mkirsano, @mmusich, @mtosi, @rovere this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-aa9e2b/40342/summary.html
COMMIT: 4faa031
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-07-11-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/45428/40342/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

  • DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 18 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3451616
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 851
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3450745
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 206 log files, 170 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

REMINDER @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela: This PR was tested with cms-sw/cmsdist#9288, please check if they should be merged together

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/generators-l2 , can you please review and sign it. This only moves the LHERunInfo::Process comparision operators . This is needed for CLANG 18 with c++20

@dan131riley
Copy link

Please review and sign, the errors are arguably correct and the changes are technically trivial

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/generators-l2 please review this PR?
@cms-sw/orp-l2 , we need this to go in. Without this clang compilation is failing for PR tests e.g see #45300 (comment) . Changes here are trivial and should not break any thing

@menglu21
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@menglu21
Copy link
Contributor

sorry for overlooking it

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 7135505 into cms-sw:master Jul 16, 2024
11 checks passed
@slava77 slava77 mentioned this pull request Jul 16, 2024
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants