-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[14.0.X] Computation of silicon strip hit efficiency : Consecutive missing hits recovery #45014
[14.0.X] Computation of silicon strip hit efficiency : Consecutive missing hits recovery #45014
Conversation
…in an inactive module
Co-authored-by: Andrea Perrotta <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrea Perrotta <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrea Perrotta <[email protected]>
…in an inactive module Co-authored-by: Raphael Haeberle <[email protected]>
type bug-fix |
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for CMSSW_14_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @saumyaphor4252 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
cms-bot internal usage |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c35a3e/39462/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
backport of #45008
backport of #44858
PR description:
This PR is a combined backport.
The goal is s apply in the 2024 data-taking release the correction introduced in PR #44858 to both the
SiStripHitEfficiencyWorker
module which is run as part of thePromptCalibProdSiStripHitEff
Prompt Calibration Loop workflow and the standaloneHitEff
class used in the SiStrip Calibration trees.Features introduced (as per #44858 (comment)):
PR validation:
See #45008 (comment)
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Verbatim combined backport of #45008 and #44858