-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Phase-2 L1T] small fixes for RCT cluster emulation #43950
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43950/38827
|
A new Pull Request was created by @pallabidas (Pallabi Das) for master. It involves the following packages:
@srimanob, @subirsarkar, @cmsbuild, @aloeliger, @epalencia can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-121b07/37433/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
bool is_ss; | ||
if (pt > 130) | ||
is_ss = true; | ||
else if ((abs(eta) > 0.4 && abs(eta) < 0.5) || (abs(eta) > 0.75 && abs(eta) < 0.85)) // temporary adjustment | ||
is_ss = ((loose_ss_offset + c1_ss * std::exp(-c2_ss * pt)) <= ss); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This part contains many magic numbers, including pt cut above. Is it possible to define them as constexpr float
before?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@srimanob done
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43950/38853
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43950/38854
|
Pull request #43950 was updated. @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @aloeliger, @epalencia, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again. |
Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-121b07/37458/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+l1
|
+Upgrade |
Do we need a backport to 14_0? |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Hi @srimanob we would like this to be included in the new samples, so yes for backport to 14_0 |
+1 |
PR description:
Small changes to correctly use ECAL LSB = 0.5 in firmware based code. A fix in RCT cluster stitching function and shower shape flag is implemented.
Also being reviewed here: cms-l1t-offline#1206
PR validation:
Passes local validation checks with efficiency and rate plots, to be presented in a DP note.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
not a backport
@aloeliger @epalencia