Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use likelihood fit instead of chi-square fit in PVValidation #43588

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2023

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

This should fix the unit test failure for slc7 IB (see #43106 and #43577 )

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test for slc7_amd64_gcc12

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 17, 2023

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43588/38241

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Alignment/OfflineValidation (alca)

@consuegs, @perrotta, @saumyaphor4252 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@adewit, @mmusich, @tocheng, @yuanchao, @tlampen, @rsreds this is something you requested to watch as well.
@sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-79a965/36539/summary.html
COMMIT: 7cd352e
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2023-12-17-0000/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/43588/36539/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-79a965/36538/summary.html
COMMIT: 7cd352e
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2023-12-17-0000/slc7_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/43588/36538/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 54 lines from the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 62836 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3429858
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 160567
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 258
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3269011
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 6.132 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10224.0 ): 0.127 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 12634.0 ): 5.430 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 141.044 ): -0.016 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 250202.181 ): 0.288 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 25202.0 ): 0.303 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • Checked 214 log files, 167 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 17 / 48 workflows

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich you are the author of this code: it seems perfectly fine to me using likelihood instead of chisquare (likelihood is also already used in the second fit at L245), but if you have any issue please speak up. Otherwise this PR can be signed.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Dec 18, 2023

@perrotta no objections.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants