-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[14.0.X] increase number of sequences to be analyzed in DQMOffline/Configuration
unit tests
#43575
[14.0.X] increase number of sequences to be analyzed in DQMOffline/Configuration
unit tests
#43575
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43575/38210
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @tjavaid, @antoniovagnerini, @rvenditti, @syuvivida can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-31a6e7/36511/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cms-sw/dqm-l2 do you have comments on this? |
closing in favor of #43586 |
forward port of #42983
PR description:
See #42983 (comment). Cures failures in the IB unit tests
PR validation:
scram b runtests_TestDQMOfflineConfigurationGotAll use-ibeos
runs fine.If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, but a forward port.