-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
L1FinalOR decision in BX-1 and -2 in NANOAOD #43306
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43306/37751
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43306/37752
|
A new Pull Request was created by @lathomas for master. It involves the following packages:
@simonepigazzini, @cmsbuild, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
enable nano |
please test |
Hi @lathomas, talks for future reNANOs are ongoing. It would indeed be good to have this change backported to 13_3 as well. |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
I don't think the reported errors are related to this PR which doesn't touch RECO. @simonepigazzini any thought? Thanks. |
I agree, I will retrigger the tests anyway. It won't take long anyway |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
I guess this is the issue ? |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-800e4d/35955/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
Hello @vlimant @simonepigazzini This time the tests succeeded. Can you review the PR and eventually sign off? Thanks, |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR adds two booleans to NANOAOD (
L1_FinalOR_BXmin1
,L1_FinalOR_BXmin2
) checking whether the L1 final or was fired in BX-2 or -1 (which would lead the BX0 to be masked by trigger rules).PR validation:
The NANO steps of workflows
2500.4
,141.044
ran succesfully. It was explicitly checked on a few events known to prefire that the boolean decisions are correct.If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
My understanding is that a backport to
13_3_X
is needed for future reNANO of 2022/2023 (?).