Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix upper bound of the scale in SUEP shower simulation #43165

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2023

Conversation

tvami
Copy link
Contributor

@tvami tvami commented Nov 1, 2023

PR description:

SUEP simulations have a bug with the upper bound of the scale to be fixed at 2.0, this PR fixes that (credit to @cericeci).

The change was validated by the analysis team and private samples were shown at
https://indico.cern.ch/event/1157541/#24-suep-signal-details
Now they are requesting official samples so we need it in CMSSW.

PR validation:

This PR has no effect on bkg samples, or most of the signal samples, it's only relevant to SUEP showers with Pythia. See the link above for the validation by analysts.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Should be backported to both 12_4_X (for Run-3 samples) and 10_6_X (for UL)

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Nov 1, 2023

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43165/37485

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2023

A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • GeneratorInterface/Pythia8Interface (generators)

@mkirsano, @alberto-sanchez, @menglu21, @bbilin, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @SiewYan can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2023

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e4d96f/35553/summary.html
COMMIT: 6c8dd57
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2023-11-01-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/43165/35553/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3362691
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3362663
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • Checked 214 log files, 167 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Nov 2, 2023

diffs in MsgLogger only, as expected

@menglu21
Copy link
Contributor

menglu21 commented Nov 2, 2023

Hi @tvami which slide shows the difference between with and w/o the fix

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Nov 2, 2023

hi @menglu21 there is no plot before the fix, Pythia simply crashes for the higher T samples. For example slide 15, T=5GeV I understand has already been problematic.

@menglu21
Copy link
Contributor

menglu21 commented Nov 3, 2023

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 3, 2023

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Nov 3, 2023

@cms-sw/orp-l2 if you have the chance to merge this today, I'll get started doing the backports and hopefully by done by OPR next week

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants