-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[NanoAOD] Fix typos in jetsAK4 CHS and Puppi tables #42670
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42670/36746
|
A new Pull Request was created by @hqucms (Huilin Qu) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@hqucms can you elaborate on the fix? I think this affects only custom production in which either PNet or PartT are evaluated on the fly while producing NANO, right? Thank you |
Hi @simonepigazzini -- yes that's correct. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42670/36752
|
Pull request #42670 was updated. @cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @vlimant can you please check and sign again. |
Hi @simonepigazzini -- it turns out that there is another typo, i.e., in the definition of |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42670/36753
|
Pull request #42670 was updated. @cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @vlimant can you please check and sign again. |
@cms-sw/btv-pog-l2 please have a look. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42670/36775
|
Pull request #42670 was updated. @cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @vlimant can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
btagRobustParTAK4CvB = Var("?(pt>=15)&&(bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probc')+bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probb')+bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probbb')+bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:problepb'))>0?bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probc')/(bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probc')+bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probb')+bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probbb')+bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:problepb')):-1",float,doc="DeepJet c vs b+bb+lepb discriminator",precision=10), | ||
btagRobustParTAK4QG = Var("?(pt>=15)&&(bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probg')+bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probuds'))>0?bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probg')/(bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probg')+bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probuds')):-1",float,doc="DeepJet g vs uds discriminator",precision=10), | ||
btagRobustParTAK4B = Var("?(pt>=15)?bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probb')+bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probbb')+bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:problepb'):-1",float,doc="RobustParTAK4 b+bb+lepb tag discriminator",precision=10), | ||
btagRobustParTAK4C = Var("?(pt>=15)?bDiscriminator('pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTags:probc'):-1",float,doc="RobustParTAK4 charm tag raw score",precision=10), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm puzzled that this went unnoticed in the validation @AnnikaStein .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@swertz confirmed that this needs a fix for the ongoing production
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have a plan? Are we stopping the production?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The production is stopped: https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/PDMVRERECO-72?focusedId=4926345&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-4926345.
The plan is to backport this PR to 13_0 asap and restart the production.
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6e83d2/34539/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
Not from my side. |
+1 @hqucms can you open a backport to 13_0 please? |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Hi @simonepigazzini -- sure I will do it today. |
Backport to 13_0_X created: #42710 |
+1 |
PR description:
This pull request fixes a few typos in the jetsAK4 CHS and Puppi tables:
(1) Fix to the
btagRobustParTAK4CvB
definition: the previous definition was using thepfDeepFlavourJetTags
instead of pfParticleTransformerAK4JetTagsfor the
probbband
problepb` scores in the denominator. This affects both the CHS and Puppi AK4 jet tables, and probably(?) affects the official production.(2) Fix to the
nanoAOD_addDeepInfoAK4()
fucntion in thejetsAK4_Puppi_cff.py
: this should only affects private/custom productions.PR validation:
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist: