-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix the vidNestedWPBitmap_Fall17V2 for electron in NANOAOD #42606
Fix the vidNestedWPBitmap_Fall17V2 for electron in NANOAOD #42606
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42606/36642
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Prasant1993 (Prasant Kumar Rout) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
type bugfix |
type egamma |
enable nano |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1a1639/34402/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 Thanks for the fix. There is no Run2 NanoAOD production scheduled, so at the moment for us just having this in the master is ok. Unless you have a particular use case in mind we do not see a need for any backport. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR is to fix the 'vidNestedWPBitmap' variable for electron in NanoAOD in Run2. At present, this is not being correctly filled for Run2. This variable is being filled by mistakenly from this PR #40209 by @swertz for the electron/photon ID variables consistency check. We just found that this bug. Sorry, we didn't realize this mistake before.
PR validation:
runTheMatrix tests have been successfully run for the following workflows :
Backport:
Need input from Cross-POG convenors if backport to CMSSW_12_6_X is needed. It will surely go to NANOAOD V13 production.
Tagging E/Gamma convenors for more input : @swagata87 , @a-kapoor @RSalvatico