Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Top recoil hook cleaned #42180

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 19, 2023
Merged

Conversation

vslokenb
Copy link
Contributor

@vslokenb vslokenb commented Jul 3, 2023

PR description:

Integration of recoilToTop code into CMSSW Pythia8 interface. Allows us the option to treat the top quark as the recoiler during gluon emission in t -> bW decay. Expect to see differences between recoilToTop and the current recoilToColoured options, particularly in B hadron sensitive variables. PR includes header file containing actual function, as well as edits to existing files Pythia8Hadronizer.cc and Py8Interface.cc to incorporate said changes. Python config file to for easy test and run of recoilToTop is included.

PR validation:

Compiles properly using scram b -j 8 and scram b codeformat Private samples generated with careful analysis conducted in Rivet to compare between the different recoiler options. No issues in using each of the options when running CMSSW. Only validated on CMSSW_13_2_0_pre1.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 3, 2023

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42180/36178

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 3, 2023

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42180/36179

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42180/36181

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2023

A new Pull Request was created by @vslokenb for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • GeneratorInterface/Pythia8Interface (generators)

@SiewYan, @mkirsano, @Saptaparna, @cmsbuild, @alberto-sanchez, @menglu21, @GurpreetSinghChahal can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2023

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42180/36183

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42180/36261

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #42180 was updated. @SiewYan, @mkirsano, @Saptaparna, @cmsbuild, @alberto-sanchez, @menglu21, @GurpreetSinghChahal can you please check and sign again.

@smuzaffar smuzaffar modified the milestones: CMSSW_13_2_X, CMSSW_13_3_X Jul 18, 2023
@menglu21
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/generators-l2 please evaluate which other backports may be needed, besides the already submitted #42202 for CMSSW_10_6_X

Hi @perrotta CMSSW_12_4_X should also need for Run3 production

@menglu21
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@menglu21
Copy link
Contributor

seems I should assign the test again, should I do "-1" and launch the test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-922329/33747/summary.html
COMMIT: 3391702
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-07-18-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/42180/33747/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Found compilation warnings

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 6 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 14 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3195634
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 11
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3195601
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants