-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prevent producing EMTFTrack if only muon shower was unpacked #42172
Prevent producing EMTFTrack if only muon shower was unpacked #42172
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42172/36170
|
A new Pull Request was created by @eyigitba for master. It involves the following packages:
@epalencia, @cmsbuild, @aloeliger can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelVals
RelVals-INPUT |
@perrotta the relval file |
@aloeliger IT people are working on it, I believe |
Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7efca9/33537/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
type bugfix |
+l1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This is a quick PR to fix something I missed in #41993. I should have made it so that no EMTFTrack is produced for muon shower only DAQ blocks. Now this is fixed.
PR validation:
Validated by running on recent data, behaves expectedly.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for: