-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Recovery of missing hits for Strip Hit Efficiency #41970
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41970/35932
|
A new Pull Request was created by @DenkMybu (Raphael Haeberle) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @tvami, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
The May 23 slides have
this is the latter, with transitions, right? |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8a4735/33173/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41970/35940
|
Pull request #41970 was updated. @cmsbuild, @tvami, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comments on magic numbers and for loops + other cosmetic comments
TrajectoryMeasurement TM_tmp(tmpTmeas.back()); | ||
unsigned int iidd_tmp = TM_tmp.recHit()->geographicalId().rawId(); | ||
if (iidd_tmp != 0) { | ||
LogDebug("SiStripHitEfficiency:HitEff") << " hit actually being added to TM vector" << endl; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in general the LogInfo and LogDebug dont need the << endl
for the ending
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
finally, please address also this comment @DenkMybu
LogDebug("SiStripHitEfficiency:HitEff") << " hit actually being added to TM vector" << endl; | |
LogDebug("SiStripHitEfficiency:HitEff") << " hit actually being added to TM vector"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This comment still needs to be addressed
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41970/36057
|
Pull request #41970 was updated. @cmsbuild, @tvami, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8a4735/33377/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
I think so. Even if it is a bit counterintuitive to me, and certainly error prone, "-2" as uint is 4294967294 , but I've checked now that |
thank you for the check. @cms-sw/alca-l2 please sign at earliest convenience, as already reported, this needs to be backported (and integrated in the PCL as well). |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
These changes implement the recovery of missing hits for the mkFit trajectories. Without this, the hit efficiency is overestimated in single-sided layers.
Output changes : no changes in the output format
Other PRs : None
Indico page for results : https://indico.cern.ch/event/1271487/ (Update on hit efficiency)
PR validation:
Version comparisons checked (see indico page above), tested with/without changes