Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modernize TrackSplittingMonitor and fix bug with filling ME-s #41690

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 19, 2023

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented May 15, 2023

PR description:

The main goal of this PR is to fix the filling of the residuals in the TrackSplittingMonitor DQM code. I noticed that in recent cosmic data these plots are almost all empty (see e.g.https://tinyurl.com/2q9tgomk). This was caused by a bug in the filling of the MonitorElements which is fixed in this PR.
I profit of it to:

  • modernize the code of the module
  • introduce a fillDescriptions method and use it in the related configurations
  • remove the TrackSplitMonitor from the Tracking DQM collisions setup as anyway there are no right input tracks to be fed to the module.

PR validation:

Run successfully runTheMatrix.py -l 138.1 -t 4 -j 8 --custom_command='-n 5000' --ibeos and checked that the cosmic plots are all filled.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, but needs to be backported to CMSSW_13_0_X for 2023 data-takging purposes.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 15, 2023

type bug-fix

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41690/35559

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQM/TrackingMonitor (dqm)
  • DQM/TrackingMonitorSource (dqm)

@nothingface0, @emanueleusai, @cmsbuild, @pmandrik, @syuvivida, @tjavaid, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@arossi83, @VourMa, @hdelanno, @sroychow, @JanFSchulte, @VinInn, @fioriNTU, @jandrea, @mtosi, @idebruyn, @mmusich, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 15, 2023

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6b2ecc/32654/summary.html
COMMIT: 2d80b3e
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-15-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/41690/32654/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 14 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3460706
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3460678
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -356.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): -11.125 KiB Tracking/TrackParameters
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41690/35582

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #41690 was updated. @nothingface0, @emanueleusai, @cmsbuild, @pmandrik, @syuvivida, @tjavaid, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 17, 2023

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6b2ecc/32685/summary.html
COMMIT: 04044ba
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-17-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/41690/32685/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 3 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3222086
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3222064
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -356.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): -11.125 KiB Tracking/TrackParameters
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 17, 2023

@emanueleusai @perrotta PR is ready for further review.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@emanueleusai @perrotta PR is ready for further review.

This is fine with me, I did not spot other issues besides that (pre-existent) bug to be fixed

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants