[NanoAOD] Fix typo of imported ParticleNet tagger list for AK4 Puppi jets

[nurfikri89]

PR description:

This PR fixes a typo bug for the imported ParticleNet tagger list in nanoAOD_addDeepInfoAK4 function in jetsAK4_Puppi_cff.py. Confirmed by @scooperstein that this is a typo. Replace CHS with Puppi.

PR validation:

passes the usual runTheMatrix test: runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos

Backport:

To be backported to 13_1_X and 13_0_X.

[nurfikri89]

FYI @vlimant @simonepigazzini @AnnikaStein @AlexDeMoor

[simonepigazzini]

Does this affect the PNet output when running the evaluation on top of MINI or also when producing MINI collections? I.e. do we have a problem for prompt MINI/NANO or does this affect only workflows that re-evaluate PNet on top of MINI?

[scooperstein]

Does this affect the PNet output when running the evaluation on top of MINI or also when producing MINI collections? I.e. do we have a problem for prompt MINI/NANO or does this affect only workflows that re-evaluate PNet on top of MINI?

Hi @simonepigazzini , this only affects the evaluation of PNet at NanoAOD level on PUPPI jets. We missed this before because did not specifically test this workflow, since I think the only near-term evaluation of PNet at NanoAOD level planned was for the re-nano of the Run-2 UL with CHS jets. So it should anyway be transparent to any ongoing MINIAOD+NanoAOD workflows (this function was set not to be run under any current configuration), but it's important to fix it for later.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41687/35557

• This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @nurfikri89 (Nurfikri Norjoharuddeen) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• PhysicsTools/NanoAOD (xpog)

@cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @swertz, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@gpetruc, @AnnikaStein this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[simonepigazzini]

Thanks @scooperstein, this is what I expected and it is good to hear. We should probably consider adding a test workflow in the matrix for this.

[perrotta]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fb9fbb/32649/summary.html
COMMIT: 9c0a3f9
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-15-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/41687/32649/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 10 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3461474
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3461449
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[perrotta]

type bug-fix

[simonepigazzini]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1