Add loose showers to uGMT shower bit vs. BX DQM plot

[dinyar]

PR description:

This PR adds the loose showers from EMTF to the uGMT shower bit vs. BX DQM plot. (This one plot was forgotten in #41182.)

PR validation:

Ran the usual commands to check formatting etc.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41448/35308

• This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @dinyar (Dinyar Rabady) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• DQM/L1TMonitor (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @cmsbuild, @syuvivida, @rvenditti, @micsucmed, @pmandrik can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@missirol this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[perrotta]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ce2476/32227/summary.html
COMMIT: 146f4c6
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-04-28-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/41448/32227/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 14 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3460877
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 10
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3460845
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[rappoccio]

@emanueleusai can you sign this one as well? The backport is also needed for the next 13_0_X

[perrotta]

+1

• The identical backport PR in 13_0_X was signed by DQM with motivation "Already tested at playback and deployed in production online DQM": I assume the same motivation can also hold here in master.
• Let merge this in master, so that the backport can also get merged after it, and enter the next release for data taking

[perrotta]

merge

[perrotta]

@emanueleusai can you sign this one as well? The backport is also needed for the next 13_0_X

Sorry Sal, we overlapped: well, dqm does not have to bother with this signature now, and they can deal with the other missing ones

[emanueleusai]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.