Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport to CMSSW_13_0_X of new extended ParticleNet networks for jet classification, regression, and taus #41265

Merged

Conversation

scooperstein
Copy link

This pull request would backport the recently merged PR here into CMSSW_13_0_X. This PR would add a variety of new performance improvements in jet flavor classification, jet energy regression, and tau ID and reconstruction that are important additions to include for Run-3 analyses. For many more details, please refer to the original PR. The code changes from the PR itself should be identical to those just merged in the master branch.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

tests seem stuck: try to restart them

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

test parameters:

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

cms-sw/cmsdist#8436 backports cms-sw/cmsdist#8422 to 13_0_X

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-97d501/31909/summary.html
COMMIT: 3c15acd
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-04-11-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/41265/31909/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 140.6140.6_RunHI2022/step2_RunHI2022.log
  • 1002.41002.4_RunDoubleMuon2022B/step2_RunDoubleMuon2022B.log
  • 11834.9911834.99_TTbar_14TeV+2021PU_PMXS1S2/step2_TTbar_14TeV+2021PU_PMXS1S2.log
Expand to see more relval errors ...

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 27 lines to the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 6154 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3553808
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 106
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3553680
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 45.801 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 5.549 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 13234.0,... ): 3.479 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

NANO Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 51 lines to the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 152 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 12
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 11636
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 173
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 11463
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 51.254 KiB( 11 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2500.311,... ): 8.261 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2500.331,... ): 6.190 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2500.401,... ): 0.588 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2500.601 ): 5.549 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • Checked 25 log files, 11 edm output root files, 12 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

Sample kb/ev ref kb/ev diff kb/ev ev/s/thd ref ev/s/thd diff rate mem/thd ref mem/thd
2500.31 2.343 2.232 0.110 ( +4.9% ) 5.58 9.41 -40.7% 1.420 1.390
2500.311 2.440 2.322 0.118 ( +5.1% ) 5.11 9.04 -43.5% 1.781 1.741
2500.312 2.391 2.275 0.116 ( +5.1% ) 5.25 9.23 -43.1% 1.771 1.732
2500.33 1.172 1.098 0.074 ( +6.7% ) 10.61 21.16 -49.9% 1.484 1.617
2500.331 1.508 1.392 0.115 ( +8.3% ) 5.83 15.30 -61.9% 1.651 1.612
2500.332 1.409 1.324 0.086 ( +6.5% ) 8.29 17.20 -51.8% 1.593 1.551
2500.401 2.137 2.137 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 10.45 10.39 +0.5% 1.106 1.099
2500.501 1.710 1.710 -0.000 ( -0.0% ) 16.91 16.75 +1.0% 1.057 1.063
2500.511 1.122 1.122 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 30.98 30.63 +1.1% 1.318 1.307
2500.5111 1.477 1.477 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 19.85 16.82 +18.0% 1.363 1.362
2500.601 2.038 2.049 -0.011 ( -0.5% ) 12.58 12.52 +0.4% 1.085 1.087

@simonepigazzini
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure of what is causing the failures. The changes in the PR should not affect those workflows.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Apr 12, 2023

@simonepigazzini timeouts in RelValInputs workflows are quite common
Let retest, to see if we can get rid of them
(Otherwise, just ignore them)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-97d501/31930/summary.html
COMMIT: 3c15acd
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-04-11-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/41265/31930/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-97d501/31930/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-97d501/31930/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 12 lines from the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 6155 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3553808
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 103
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3553683
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 45.801 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 5.549 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 13234.0,... ): 3.479 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

NANO Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 59 lines to the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 152 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 12
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 11636
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 173
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 11463
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 51.254 KiB( 11 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2500.311,... ): 8.261 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2500.331,... ): 6.190 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2500.401,... ): 0.588 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 2500.601 ): 5.549 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • Checked 25 log files, 11 edm output root files, 12 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

Sample kb/ev ref kb/ev diff kb/ev ev/s/thd ref ev/s/thd diff rate mem/thd ref mem/thd
2500.31 2.343 2.232 0.110 ( +4.9% ) 5.59 9.42 -40.6% 1.415 1.458
2500.311 2.440 2.322 0.118 ( +5.1% ) 5.01 9.01 -44.4% 1.771 1.747
2500.312 2.391 2.275 0.116 ( +5.1% ) 5.23 9.12 -42.7% 1.765 1.738
2500.33 1.172 1.098 0.074 ( +6.7% ) 10.54 21.09 -50.0% 1.485 1.622
2500.331 1.508 1.392 0.115 ( +8.3% ) 5.76 15.35 -62.5% 1.650 1.610
2500.332 1.409 1.324 0.086 ( +6.5% ) 8.20 17.28 -52.5% 1.585 1.575
2500.401 2.137 2.137 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 10.35 10.42 -0.7% 1.092 1.181
2500.501 1.710 1.710 -0.000 ( -0.0% ) 16.59 16.69 -0.6% 1.046 1.121
2500.511 1.122 1.122 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 30.67 30.68 -0.1% 1.289 1.364
2500.5111 1.477 1.477 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 19.05 19.47 -2.1% 1.335 1.408
2500.601 2.038 2.049 -0.011 ( -0.5% ) 12.49 12.27 +1.8% 1.079 1.104

@simonepigazzini
Copy link
Contributor

+1

The changes are in line with the original PR. Signing this off from xpog

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Only mini and nano involved with the addition of ParticleNet, ok to backport

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants