Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

extended existing HLT tau-jet correlation module #40993

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 9, 2023
Merged

extended existing HLT tau-jet correlation module #40993

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 9, 2023

Conversation

brallmond
Copy link
Contributor

@brallmond brallmond commented Mar 8, 2023

PR description:

To support a future VBF Single Tau HLT in the scenario that VBF Parking is accepted (see JIRA https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSLITDPG-1099 and https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSHLT-2702), a small change to an existing HLT module is necessary. The change extends the module's usage from only handling 2 Jet + 2 Tau events to also handling 2 Jet + 1 Tau events. This change depends on no other PRs and affects code used by one existing HLT path, and would allow the implementation of a future HLT path.

PR validation:

In the course of estimating rate and gain for the proposed VBF Single Tau path, the same metrics were also computed for the VBF DiTau path with the module extension in place and no differences were found in past and current behavior of the path.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 8, 2023

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40993/34502

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 8, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40993/34504

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 8, 2023

A new Pull Request was created by @brallmond (Braden Allmond) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoTauTag/HLTProducers (hlt)

@cmsbuild, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@silviodonato, @missirol, @azotz, @mbluj this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

Copy link
Contributor

@missirol missirol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This update of the filter doesn't fit very well with the name of the plugin ("*WithDiTau"). One option is to add a copy of this plugin with a more suitable name (and we keep the current one in 13_1_X and 13_0_X for backward compatibility). This could be done by just doing

DEFINE_FWK_MODULE(HLTPFDiJetCorrCheckerWithDiTau);
using HLTDiPFJetPlusTauFilter = HLTPFDiJetCorrCheckerWithTaus;
DEFINE_FWK_MODULE(HLTDiPFJetPlusTausFilter);

Eventually (e.g. 13_2_X), the old plugin would be removed (and replaced at HLT by the new one). Thoughts?

the same metrics were also computed for the VBF DiTau path with the module extension in place and no differences were found in past and current behavior of the path.

As far as I understand, this is because that single use case in the current HLT is preceded by a filter requiring the input taus are at least 2. In general, this update changes the behaviour of the filter. Is that correct?

@brallmond
Copy link
Contributor Author

This update of the filter doesn't fit very well with the name of the plugin ("*WithDiTau"). One option is to add a copy of this plugin with a more suitable name (and we keep the current one in 13_1_X and 13_0_X for backward compatibility). This could be done by just doing

DEFINE_FWK_MODULE(HLTPFDiJetCorrCheckerWithDiTau);
using HLTDiPFJetPlusTauFilter = HLTPFDiJetCorrCheckerWithTaus;
DEFINE_FWK_MODULE(HLTDiPFJetPlusTausFilter);

Eventually (e.g. 13_2_X), the old plugin would be removed (and replaced at HLT by the new one). Thoughts?

Yes, I agree that's a good way to change the filter name in the future and proceed with the change. The code has been added. I think "HLTPFDiJetCorrCheckerWithTaus" above should have been "HLTPFDiJetCorrCheckerWithDiTau" so I changed it in the new commit

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 8, 2023

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40993/34507

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

missirol commented Mar 8, 2023

I think "HLTPFDiJetCorrCheckerWithTaus" above should have been "HLTPFDiJetCorrCheckerWithDiTau" so I changed it in the new commit

Right, sorry for the confusion.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 8, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40993/34508

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 8, 2023

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6880f2/31147/summary.html
COMMIT: 66f9c28
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-03-08-1300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40993/31147/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 13 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 7 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3530381
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3530350
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 9, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40993/34528

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 9, 2023

Pull request #40993 was updated. @cmsbuild, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald can you please check and sign again.

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

missirol commented Mar 9, 2023

please test

(Didn't squash in 1 commit, but having 3 commits is not a problem, imho.)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 9, 2023

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6880f2/31161/summary.html
COMMIT: 5335974
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-03-08-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40993/31161/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 4 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3530381
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3530358
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

missirol commented Mar 9, 2023

+hlt

  • extends the logic of an existing HLT filter
  • does not change the results of the current HLT menu
  • adds a copy of the plugin with a clearer name, to be adopted in future HLT menus (to be done in CMSHLT-2700)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 9, 2023

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants