Fix expected version number of uGT with muon shower support

[dinyar]

PR description:

This PR fixes a typo in the expected version number for uGT firmware that has support for muon showers.

PR validation:

Ran on 2022G data to confirm that the firmware check now succeeds.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40822/34276

• This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @dinyar (Dinyar Rabady) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• EventFilter/L1TRawToDigi (l1)
• L1Trigger/L1TMuon (l1)

@epalencia, @cmsbuild, @cecilecaillol, @rekovic can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @JanFSchulte, @thomreis, @eyigitba this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[epalencia]

Please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-43529a/30766/summary.html
COMMIT: 8380096
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-02-20-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40822/30766/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 14 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 16 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3529029
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3528998
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[epalencia]

+l1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1