New Run3 pileup scenarios for max PU studies

[knollejo]

New pileup scenarios for Run3, corresponding to a maximum pileup of 60, 65, and 70 in the hybrid filling scheme. The methodology used for the creation of these scenarios is the same that was used for #34460, now with the available predictions for 2023 conditions (as provided by LHC experts over a year ago), a minimum bias cross section of 80mb, and with the instantaneous luminosity profile scaled to different leveling luminosities. The three scenarios are:

• 2023_LHC_Simulation_14h_10h_hybrid2p05 ("pileup 60")
  • 2440 bunches, initial inst. lumi 2.05e34 Hz/m2, 14h fill with 10h leveling
  • 
  • actual peak at pileup 59
• 2023_LHC_Simulation_12p5h_9h_hybrid2p23 ("pileup 65")
  • 2440 bunches, initial inst. lumi 2.23e34 Hz/m2, 12.5h fill with 9h leveling
  • 
  • actual peak at pileup 64
• 2023_LHC_Simulation_11h_8h_hybrid2p40 ("pileup 70")
  • 2440 bunches, initial inst. lumi 2.40e34 Hz/m2, 11h fill with 8h leveling
  • 
  • actual peak at pileup 69

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40267/33323

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/StandardSequences/python/Mixing.py modified in PR(s): Adding Running PU ProdLike Wfs #40244

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @knollejo (Joscha Knolle) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)
• SimGeneral/MixingModule (simulation)

@perrotta, @rappoccio, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabiocos, @VourMa, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @lecriste, @mmusich, @sameasy, @mtosi, @dgulhan, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[civanch]

please test

[civanch]

@knollejo , please have a look - abnormal end of each file. This may be OK but may be not.

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b06b53/29551/summary.html
COMMIT: f8844c4
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2022-12-09-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/40267/29551/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 29 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3421510
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1189
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3420299
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 206 log files, 158 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[perrotta]

@knollejo I think that a 12_5 backport is also in order, if needed by the HLT (unless HLT moves the development version to 12_6 as soon as 12_6_0 will become available, likely in the next few days): please @cms-sw/hlt-l2 let us know

[perrotta]

@knollejo @civanch this PR would be welcome to be merged in 12_4_X rather soon, in order to start possible productions before the break. Could you please try to converge on it at your earliest convenience?

[missirol]

(unless HLT moves the development version to 12_6 as soon as 12_6_0 will become available, likely in the next few days): please @cms-sw/hlt-l2 let us know

@perrotta , HLT-menu development already moved to 12_6_X (see description of #40220).

[knollejo]

@knollejo , please have a look - abnormal end of each file. This may be OK but may be not.

Fixed.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40267/33339

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/StandardSequences/python/Mixing.py modified in PR(s): Adding Running PU ProdLike Wfs #40244

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #40267 was updated. @perrotta, @rappoccio, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[civanch]

please test

[perrotta]

@smuzaffar I think bot is stuck: code-checks and tests are stuck in all PRs since some while.

[smuzaffar]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b06b53/29584/summary.html
COMMIT: 2431191
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2022-12-12-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40267/29584/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 29 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3421510
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1192
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3420296
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 206 log files, 158 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[civanch]

+1

[perrotta]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.