-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update EDM inputs to HLT-Validation tests [8_0_X
only]
#40030
Update EDM inputs to HLT-Validation tests [8_0_X
only]
#40030
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @missirol (Marino Missiroli) for CMSSW_8_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@Martin-Grunewald, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar, @makortel, @cmsbuild, @missirol can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ddf8e4/28917/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
cd21891
to
8766d10
Compare
Pull request #40030 was updated. @cmsbuild, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald can you please check and sign again. |
please test This will not fully fix the HLT-Validation tests in PS.
Actually, this PR is not strictly needed (like the 5_3_X one), it is done more for consistency with the other ones; technically all input files of the HLT-Val tests in |
8766d10
to
5db8986
Compare
Pull request #40030 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar, @makortel, @cmsbuild, @missirol can you please check and sign again. |
please test From #40013 (comment) ..
.. sadly I have to retract this, as I would also change the input of one addon test (from RAW-RECO to RAW, which is the preferred tier for HLT). The file in question is not in the bot cache, but it will be once the PR is merged and tested in a IB (the file is currently at a T3). |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ddf8e4/29213/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
HLT-integration tests cannot run with SLC6 architectures, due to an incompatibility with the latest .jar files of ConfDB-v2. For further details, see cms-sw#40013 (comment)
Pull request #40030 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar, @makortel, @cmsbuild, @missirol can you please check and sign again. |
please test See #40013 (comment). |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ddf8e4/29234/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+hlt This PR fixes the HLT-Val tests currently failing in The update of 1 input file of the |
+1 |
Ah, ok: the @cms-sw/core-l2 is still missing. |
@smuzaffar , could you please check this PR, #40029 and #40028, and sign them for Core-Sw if you agree? It would be good to test them in IBs over this weekend. |
+core |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_0_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
This PR is specific to the
CMSSW_8_0_X
release cycle.Some of the HLT-Validation tests running in IBs started to fail due to the unavailability of EDM files used as input to these tests (see IB dashboard, and #40013).
This PR updates the path to these files,
to use copies kept in the TSG area on EOS.which will now rely on the cms-bot cache (see discussion in #40013 and #40020, where the corresponding updates tocms-bot
are also mentioned).In addition, it disables the HLT-integration-tests part of the HLT-Validation tests for scram-archs in SLC6, which are incompatible with the most recent version of ConfDB-v2 (see #40013 (comment)).
PR validation:
None.
If this PR is a backport, please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported, please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
N/A