EMTF DQM fix to remove duplicate x-axis bin labels

[nickh2000]

PR description:

Changed DQM plot neighbor labels to avoid duplicates. This meant relabeling DQM plots such as cscDQMOccupancy among others. Chambers with the label "N" became labeled "N1", "N2" ... depending on which sector they preceded.

Change implemented in response to #39936, in which it was discovered that histogram merging is dependent on bin labels in newer ROOT versions, and therefore cannot be duplicate (#25569)

The flag gemChamberBXVFAT.CanExtend was also set to false for consistency with other plots.

PR validation:

First, the issue outlined in #39936 was recreated using the PSet in /afs/cern.ch/user/c/cmst0/public/PausedJobs/HIReplay2022/job_244/job/WMTaskSpace/cmsRun1. Then, the plot labels were changed and new DQMIO files were made with DQMRootOutputModule. These files substituted the input files used in #39936 and the merge was successful.

ROOT files were also created using DQMFileSaverPB to view the plots and ensure that the labels were correct.

This change will also be backported to release CMSSW_12_5_X and 12_5_1_patch1,

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39952/32881

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39952/32881/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl -k https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39952/32881/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39952/32882

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @nickh2000 for master.

It involves the following packages:

• DQM/L1TMonitor (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@missirol this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

type bug-fix

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bce884/28718/summary.html
COMMIT: d491976
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-11-01-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39952/28718/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
534.0 step 1
536.0 step 1
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 10 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3416398
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 12
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3416364
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 206 log files, 48 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[emanueleusai]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[mmusich]

@nickh2000 can you kindly prepare also a backport to 12_5_X for this PR?
Thanks much

[mmusich]

to speed up the procedure, I've taken the liberty to open #39952

[perrotta]

+1