-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add D97 Phase-2 geometry #39841
Add D97 Phase-2 geometry #39841
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39841/32723
|
A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob (Phat Srimanobhas) for master. It involves the following packages:
@perrotta, @rappoccio, @Dr15Jones, @bsunanda, @makortel, @bbilin, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @civanch, @sunilUIET, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours.
Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+Upgrade The new D97 workflow runs fine. The error on PR test does not relate to this PR. |
@cmsbuild please test Another try, to see if we can move away the relvals-input error. |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f45f02/28655/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+Upgrade |
@cms-sw/geometry-l2 @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 |
+geometry |
+pdmv |
from Geometry.MTDNumberingBuilder.mtdTopology_cfi import * | ||
from Geometry.MTDGeometryBuilder.mtdGeometry_cfi import * | ||
from Geometry.MTDGeometryBuilder.idealForDigiMTDGeometry_cff import * | ||
mtdGeometry.applyAlignment = cms.bool(False) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mtdGeometry.applyAlignment = cms.bool(False) | |
mtdGeometry.applyAlignment = False |
from Geometry.TrackerGeometryBuilder.trackerParameters_cff import * | ||
from Geometry.TrackerNumberingBuilder.trackerTopology_cfi import * | ||
from Geometry.TrackerGeometryBuilder.idealForDigiTrackerGeometry_cff import * | ||
trackerGeometry.applyAlignment = cms.bool(False) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
trackerGeometry.applyAlignment = cms.bool(False) | |
trackerGeometry.applyAlignment = False |
from Geometry.MTDNumberingBuilder.mtdTopology_cfi import * | ||
from Geometry.MTDGeometryBuilder.mtdGeometry_cfi import * | ||
from Geometry.MTDGeometryBuilder.idealForDigiMTDGeometry_cff import * | ||
mtdGeometry.applyAlignment = cms.bool(False) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mtdGeometry.applyAlignment = cms.bool(False) | |
mtdGeometry.applyAlignment = False |
Hi @perrotta Those lines are generated automatically from I should fix |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
For some reason the
|
Thanks @makortel |
Fix in #39992 |
PR description:
As requested in #39571 (comment), the geometry with T25 is brought back based on D88.
PR validation:
Tested with
24434.0 (2026D97+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal)
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
No need of backport
FYI @mmusich @emiglior