-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12_5_X] Fix the mismatch in transition ID for idealGeo backport #39291
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @fabferro (Fabrizio Ferro) for CMSSW_12_5_X. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @bsunanda can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@michael-pitt FYI |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1eafc9/27301/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR fixes an error caused by loading misaligned geometry record together with the aligned geometry record and hit the transitionID error:
The transition ID stored in the ESGetToken does not match the transition where the token is being used
This is happens if a user set buildMisalignedGeometry=True in CTPPSGeometryESModule.cc
Backport of PR #39264