fix_photon_trigger_filters_nanoAOD

[bartokm]

PR description:

Fixing the issue reported in cms-nanoAOD#592

PR validation:

scram build code-checks
scram build code-format

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39043/31531

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bartokm for master.

It involves the following packages:

• PhysicsTools/NanoAOD (xpog)

@cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @swertz, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@gpetruc, @swertz this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[swagata87]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e29541/26785/summary.html
COMMIT: 040d3da
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-08-12-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39043/26785/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 12 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3692476
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 116
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3692337
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 50 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[mariadalfonso]

+xpog

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[mariadalfonso]

@bartokm
can you backport to 12_4 ?

[qliphy]

+1

[mariadalfonso]

@bartokm
can you backport to 12_4 ?

@bartokm ping

[bartokm]

@bartokm
can you backport to 12_4 ?

@bartokm ping

Sorry, I was on vacation. I'm catching up with things, I'll do the backport today or tomorrow.

[mariadalfonso]

@bartokm
can you backport to 12_4 ?

@bartokm ping

Sorry, I was on vacation. I'm catching up with things, I'll do the backport today or tomorrow.

It's already done by someone else, no need to do anymore: we needed merged by today and there was another depending PR

[bartokm]

@bartokm
can you backport to 12_4 ?

@bartokm ping

Sorry, I was on vacation. I'm catching up with things, I'll do the backport today or tomorrow.

It's already done by someone else, no need to do anymore: we needed merged by today and there was another depending PR

OK. Sorry for not replying earlier.