-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Run-3 JECs to Run-3 MCs #38567
Add Run-3 JECs to Run-3 MCs #38567
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38567/30816
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
type jetmet |
@cmsbuild , please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test runtestPhysicsToolsNanoAOD had ERRORS RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...
RelVals-INPUT
|
The errors are completely unrelated... @cms-sw/orp-l2 is this known? |
It seems the test is accompanied with the just merged PR #37964 |
I think we can just merge this PR as it is (no need to retrigger tests), there are no errors connected to the GT change, what do you think @cms-sw/alca-l2 ? |
This was tested with CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-06-29-2300 as baseline, adding #37964 on top of it, but not the needed data files merged in cmsdist and only available in CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-06-30-1100 |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-acc404/25918/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Add Run-3 JECs to Run-3 MCs
PR description:
This PR adds the new Run-3 JECs to Run-3 MCs as requested in cmsTalk https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/gt-request-a-gt-for-run3-jec-tags-for-mc/12306
I created
124X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_v8
124X_mcRun3_2022cosmics_realistic_deco_v9
124X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_HI_v8
124X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v9
124X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v9
124X_mcRun4_realistic_v8
The diffs are
phase1_2022_realistic
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_v7/124X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_v8
phase1_2022_cosmics
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2022cosmics_realistic_deco_v8/124X_mcRun3_2022cosmics_realistic_deco_v9
phase1_2022_realistic_hi
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_HI_v7/124X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_HI_v8
phase1_2023_realistic
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v6/124X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v9
phase1_2024_realistic
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v6/124X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v9
phase2_realistic
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun4_realistic_v7/124X_mcRun4_realistic_v8
PR validation:
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, but will be backported to 12_4_X