-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initialisation of CaloParticle data members #36346
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36346/27103
|
A new Pull Request was created by @civanch (Vladimir Ivantchenko) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-822088/20958/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
These A few questions that show up:
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36346/27124
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
@perrotta , in these containers there are SimHits information and vectors of RecHits. When RecHits are cleared SimHits may be not. The purpose of this PR is to have initialisation of class members at construction - this is always a correct thing. In the update I put counting of SimHits in the correct place. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36346/27125
|
Pull request #36346 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-822088/20985/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Address #32905. Should not affect anything.
PR validation:
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
no