AJJGenJetFilter to filter photon+2jets events at GenLevel

[hbakhshi]

PR description:

Here is the accepted PR in the master branch:
#35547

PR validation:

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

we need the AJJGenJetFilter filter to produce some samples for the snowmass studies. the snowmass campaign is based on cmssw_11_0_x

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @hbakhshi (Hamed Bakhshian) for CMSSW_11_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

• GeneratorInterface/GenFilters (generators)

@SiewYan, @mkirsano, @Saptaparna, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from AJJGenJet filter added. #35547

[agrohsje]

please test

[hbakhshi]

@agrohsje thanks a lot

[perrotta]

backport of #35547

[perrotta]

@hbakhshi could you please modify the title in order to have it a bit more descriptive (for example starting from the same title as #35547)?

[hbakhshi]

@perrotta done, please let me know if it is not fine yet

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3c4377/20255/summary.html
COMMIT: cdf7e44
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_0_X_2021-11-04-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc820
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/35981/20255/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

The workflows 1001.0, 1000.0, 140.53, 136.85, 136.8311, 136.7611, 136.731, 4.22 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2793840
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2793498
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
• Checked 147 log files, 30 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[SiewYan]

please test workflow 1001.0, 1000.0, 140.53, 136.85, 136.8311, 136.7611, 136.731, 4.22

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3c4377/20320/summary.html
COMMIT: cdf7e44
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_0_X_2021-11-07-0000/slc7_amd64_gcc820
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35981/20320/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2793840
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2793498
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
• Checked 147 log files, 30 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[hbakhshi]

Hello @SiewYan
Thanks for triggering the tests. It seems that all the tests are passed. What would be the next step for it to get approved.

[SiewYan]

Hello, from my side it looks good.

[SiewYan]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[qliphy]

+1

[Saptaparna]

@qliphy and @perrotta: do you have plans of releasing a new version of 11_X, so we can submit this Snowmass request?

[qliphy]

@Saptaparna Yes, we will make a new 11_1_X.
We are waiting for #35939

[hbakhshi]

Hi @qliphy and @perrotta. Any news regarding the new release? We need this filter very urgently for the sample production. Any help is really appreciated

[perrotta]

Hi @qliphy and @perrotta. Any news regarding the new release? We need this filter very urgently for the sample production. Any help is really appreciated

#35939 is still wating for the requested updates to be implemented...