SiStripSourceConfigP5_cff remove parameters added by mistake in #35811

[mmusich]

resolves #35813

PR description:

Title says it all.

PR validation:

Run DQM integration tests.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

N/A

[mmusich]

test parameters:

• addpkg = DQM/Integration

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35826/26188

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• DQM/SiStripMonitorClient (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@arossi83, @hdelanno, @sroychow, @fioriNTU, @jandrea, @idebruyn, @threus, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[tvami]

type bug-fix

[tvami]

urgent

[mmusich]

Looks like unit tests passed: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-29808d/19889/unitTests/src/DQM/Integration/test/TestDQMOnlineClient-sistrip_dqm_sourceclient/testing.log

[cmsbuild]

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-29808d/19889/summary.html
COMMIT: ebef8ac
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-24-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35826/19889/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

• 2018.1

----- Begin Fatal Exception 25-Oct-2021 11:17:49 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'NoRecord' occurred while
   [0] Processing  Event run: 1 lumi: 1 event: 1 stream: 0
   [1] Running path 'prevalidation_step'
   [2] Prefetching for module MultiTrackValidator/'trackValidatorBuilding'
   [3] Prefetching for module TrackProducer/'detachedTripletStepTracks'
   [4] Prefetching for module TrackCandidateProducer/'detachedTripletStepTrackCandidates'
   [5] Prefetching for module FastTrackerRecHitMaskProducer/'detachedTripletStepMasks'
   [6] Prefetching for module TrackProducer/'detachedQuadStepTracks'
   [7] Prefetching for module TrackCandidateProducer/'detachedQuadStepTrackCandidates'
   [8] Prefetching for module FastTrackerRecHitMaskProducer/'detachedQuadStepMasks'
   [9] Prefetching for module TrackProducer/'lowPtTripletStepTracks'
   [10] Prefetching for module TrackCandidateProducer/'lowPtTripletStepTrackCandidates'
   [11] Prefetching for module FastTrackerRecHitMaskProducer/'lowPtTripletStepMasks'
   [12] Prefetching for module TrackProducer/'highPtTripletStepTracks'
   [13] Prefetching for module TrackCandidateProducer/'highPtTripletStepTrackCandidates'
   [14] Prefetching for module FastTrackerRecHitMaskProducer/'highPtTripletStepMasks'
   [15] Prefetching for module TrackProducer/'lowPtQuadStepTracks'
   [16] Prefetching for module TrackCandidateProducer/'lowPtQuadStepTrackCandidates'
   [17] Prefetching for module FastTrackerRecHitMaskProducer/'lowPtQuadStepMasks'
   [18] Calling method for module TrackTfClassifier/'initialStep'
Exception Message:
No "TfGraphRecord" record found in the EventSetup.

 The Record is delivered by an ESSource or ESProducer but there is no valid IOV for the synchronization value.
 Please check 
   a) if the synchronization value is reasonable and report to the hypernews if it is not.
   b) else check that all ESSources have been properly configured. 
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

[mmusich]

please test with #35801

[mmusich]

@jfernan2 @perrotta @qliphy given the unit test passes OK with this patch, see #35826 (comment) (and the IB is broken anyway for other reasons) can this be considered for signature?

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-29808d/19898/summary.html
COMMIT: ebef8ac
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-24-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35826/19898/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
2018.1 step 1
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2751113
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2751091
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 39 files compared)
• Checked 171 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[jfernan2]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1