-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PPS: misaligned geometry built only optionally, off by default #35423
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35423/25547
|
A new Pull Request was created by @jan-kaspar for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bafe2d/19170/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR adds a flag to
CTPPSGeometryESModule
whether the "misaligned" geometry shall be built. The flag is set to false by default. The motivation for this change includes:This PR is expected to be fully backward compatible, with no impact on the results from standard workflows. The (mis)alignment studies have so far been performed with the "direct" simulation of PPS, which uses
CTPPSCompositeESSource
instead ofCTPPSGeometryESModule
. The direct simulation is thus not affected by this PR.No backports are foreseen.
PR validation:
The plots below compare histograms produced before this PR (blue) and with this PR (red dashed):