-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed finecalo performance #34597
Fixed finecalo performance #34597
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34597/24154 ERROR: Build errors found during clang-tidy run.
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34597/24155
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
7efee66
to
03b7fbb
Compare
03b7fbb
to
8882912
Compare
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34597/24156
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34597/24158
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tklijnsma for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ... |
+Upgrade As mentioned in #34599 (comment) |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta Could one of you sign this? |
test parameters: |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@perrotta Many thanks - Looking through these errors it seems like this is unrelated to this PR, right? Could you run the tests again, or possible merge without another test? (tests succeeded 5 days ago). |
+1
|
merge |
PR description:
This patch streamlines the finecalo patch (PR 32673).
createNewHit
method of CaloSD, but only once per track.The CPU time needed per event is about 20% more than default CMSSW (hard to quantify the exact time difference due to slightly varying usage of the compute nodes I am using). This is a significant improvement w.r.t. to the finecalo patch 1, which was anywhere between 100% and 500% slower depending on the simulated event topology (it used to scale with the depth of the decay tree - the cache reduces the complexity of the algorithm immensely).
Plot of the RSS as a function of time (orange = this patch, green = the previous patch, blue = default CMSSW):
PR validation:
I checked event displays of ttbar and of a tau gun, and it looks in order.