-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build files cleaning #34544
Build files cleaning #34544
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34544/24068
|
A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master. It involves the following packages:
@andrius-k, @ianna, @kpedro88, @Martin-Grunewald, @rekovic, @tlampen, @pohsun, @cecilecaillol, @perrotta, @civanch, @yuanchao, @makortel, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @mdhildreth, @jfernan2, @slava77, @jpata, @francescobrivio, @malbouis, @kmaeshima, @srimanob, @tvami, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestDQMServicesDemo had ERRORS Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
The failures are not related to this PR right? |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test EcalDCS_O2O_test had ERRORS ---> test EcalDAQ_O2O_test had ERRORS ---> test EcalLaser_O2O_test had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fd3e23/17057/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+1 |
+l1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Another quick BuildFile cleaning PR in the style of many before (for example #34191).
This PR cleans unnecessary includes from CMSSW BuildFiles that were recently added for 12_0_0_pre4. Furthermore, unused boost dependencies are removed from the Validation subsystem.
PR validation:
CMSSW compiles.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
No backport intended.