-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MTD reconstruction: revision of the AODSIM event content #34195
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34195/23411
|
A new Pull Request was created by @fabiocos (Fabio Cossutti) for master. It involves the following packages: RecoLocalFastTime/Configuration @perrotta, @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @jfernan2, @ahmad3213, @slava77, @jpata, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Thanks @fabiocos |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1018cd/16130/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
@perrotta @jpata the last version should match your favoured style, the output is what expected (see above). At the end of the day it is mostly a matter of taste. |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1018cd/16183/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Here's what we see in 23434.21/step3.root using compareProducts (did it manually now, but
This looks in line with the expectation/description. |
@jpata yes, it confirms my test above (BTW, which tool is this compareProducts?) |
it's this one, used by the bot when profiling: https://github.com/slava77/cms-reco-tools/blob/master/compareProducts.sh |
@jpata thanks, that might be useful as a standalone utility within CMSSW as well IMHO. |
BTW, standalone usage is documented in https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/RecoIntegration#Compare_output_products |
+reconstruction
|
+1 |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Revision of the AODSIM event content of MTD, reducing effectively the output size for PU 200 by ~ 1/3. The
ValueMap
s kept in the events all refer now to the associatedgeneralTrack
, and two more are added to allow the MVA quality flag calculation to be performed without the need of a savedrecoTrackExtras
.See this presentation at the MTD DPG meeting for further details.
PR validation:
Test wf. 34634.0 runs smoothly, the update of the output is as expected, and the DQM comparison with the existing workflow does not show differences (as of CMSSW_12_0_0_pre2).