-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validation code update for MTD tracks and hits #33252
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
320065b
Adding new validation plots for tracks and hits
gsorrentino18 fc2a926
Update track validation plugin
gsorrentino18 afae069
Adding MEs for track's time and error
gsorrentino18 f5c759d
Update LocalOccupancy plot and removing MEs for non MTD tracks
gsorrentino18 0809661
Adding monitoring of the BTL rechits longitudinal position and fixing…
gsorrentino18 1af8dad
minor fix: restoring correct value of LocalPositionDebug flag
gsorrentino18 1f16063
Moving fabs to std::abs
gsorrentino18 65147b9
Update with Fabio's comments and additional MEs
gsorrentino18 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gsorrentino18 is the addition of the reconstructed longitudinal position giving the expected behaviour?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The following occupancy plot (10k MinBias) shows that the BTL crystals are correctly arranged in the module, but there's still something that needs to be understood in the reconstruction of the longitudinal position inside the crystal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what is observed likely accounts for uncertainty in the reconstructed position that is used on top of the nominal center of the crystal according to the geometry, this is seen also in the one-dimensional plot of the longitudinal position in local coordinates
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in any case the 16x3 layout is confirmed to be in the correct orientation, unlike the ETL pixels layout (@parbol FYI)