Adding Phase2 tracker T25 and T26 (for IT sensor technology studies)

[adewit]

PR description:

This PR introduces two new phase-2 Tracker layouts proposed with the IT sensors performance Task Force. They correspond to an updated evaluation of the area of the Inner Tracker that can be instrumented with 3D sensors (see https://indico.cern.ch/event/988838/contributions/4258167/attachments/2202703/3736635/em20210305.pdf).

This was mentioned previously in: #33064 (comment)

This introduces:

• T25, a Tracker based on T21, with 25x100 um2 3D pixels in Inner Tracker TBPX Layer1 and 25x100 um2 planar pixels elsewhere.
• T26, a Tracker based on T21, with 25x100 um2 3D pixels in Inner Tracker TBPX Layer1, 25x100 um2 planar pixels in TBPX Layer2, Layer3, Layer4 and 50x50 um2 pixels in TFPX and TEPX.

There are no changes in the OT wrt T21

T25:
Geometry scenario: 2026D80.
Workflows: 36[2|3]xx (no PU), 36[4|5]xx (PU).

T26:
Geometry scenario: 2026D81.
Workflows: 36[6|7]xx (no PU), 36[8|9]xx (PU).

PR validation:

• Checked XMLs make sense from Tracker design point of view
• Checked overlaps with Fireworks
• Checked workflow numbering
• Checked that workflows with scenarios D80 and D81 run smoothly with no extra errors / warnings

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Not a backport

@emiglior @mmusich @tsusa FYI

[adewit]

Marco's comments on an earlier version of the diff (pre- PR) were implemented, but the conversations can't be marked as resolved.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33222/21665

• This PR adds an extra 196KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/Geometry/python/dict2026Geometry.py modified in PR(s): update the tracking material for Phase2 geometry D49 #30126
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): Squash all Patatrack developments on top of CMSSW_11_3_0_pre5 #27983, Patatrack integration - Pixel workflows (12/N) #31854

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @adewit for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/AlCa
Configuration/Eras
Configuration/Geometry
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
Configuration/StandardSequences
Geometry/CMSCommonData
Geometry/TrackerCommonData
Geometry/TrackerRecoData
Geometry/TrackerSimData
RecoLocalTracker/SiPixelRecHits

@chayanit, @wajidalikhan, @ianna, @kpedro88, @tlampen, @pohsun, @perrotta, @civanch, @yuanchao, @makortel, @srimanob, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @mdhildreth, @slava77, @jpata, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @francescobrivio, @malbouis, @jordan-martins, @christopheralanwest, @silviodonato, @franzoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@felicepantaleo, @ghugo83, @Martin-Grunewald, @OzAmram, @threus, @mmusich, @slomeo, @venturia, @vargasa, @makortel, @JanFSchulte, @dgulhan, @ferencek, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @tocheng, @ebrondol, @mtosi, @fabiocos, @dkotlins, @lecriste, @gpetruc, @tvami this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

test parameters:

• workflows = 36234.0, 36634.0

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

This PR is to add new geometry, with no change on existing geometries, code.

[chayanit]

+1

[francescobrivio]

+alca

• adds new geometries (T25,T26) and leaves untouched the already existing ones

[silviodonato]

+operations

[jpata]

+reconstruction

• no observed reco changes
• minimal code changes in reco (PixelCPEGeneric and phase2_3DPixels modifiers for PixelCPEGenericESProducer)

[civanch]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[silviodonato]

+1

[mmusich]

thanks @silviodonato!

[emiglior]

thanks indeed!