Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Pixel 3D Digitizer] Include charge generation underneath the n-column #31977

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 30, 2020

Conversation

claralasa
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Improve 3D pixel digitization: include charge generation underneath the n-column in the 3D Pixel Digitizer, by allowing the n-column to penetrate to a certain extent.

In addition, fix some issues in the provisional validator (remember it is not part of this package and will probably be removed or migrated to the Validator package once the main development is done).

Conveners of the Upgrade Simulation group, @emiglior and @skinnari , are aware and agree.
cc: @duartej

PR validation:

Following PR instructions, a basic battery of tests was successfully run. Given that this PR is only affecting 3D pixels geometry (T23), some other tests were performed with workflows 30210.0, 30410.0, 30234.0 and 30434.0. The workflows 30410.0 and 30434.0, which include Pileup, fail launching the following error:

An exception of category 'NoSecondaryFiles' occurred while
[0] Constructing the EventProcessor
[1] Constructing module: class=MixingModule label='mix'
Exception Message:
RootEmbeddedFileSequence no input files specified for secondary input source.

Pileup files are not found in the expected repository, it is probably an issue with my config at lxplus... so I ignored it.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

It is not a backport

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31977/19441

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31977/19445

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @claralasa (Clara Lasaosa) for master.

It involves the following packages:

SimTracker/SiPhase2Digitizer

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @kpedro88, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @mtosi, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @ebrondol, @threus, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Oct 28, 2020

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 28, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

float _np_column_radius;
float _ohm_column_radius;
// Radius of Column np and ohmic
const float _np_column_radius;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code rule 2.14: '_' should not be used as first character http://cms-sw.github.io/cms_coding_rules.html
though this usage precedes this PR, it would be good to correct it here (for both the functions and the variables)

@@ -203,6 +203,11 @@
)
)

# Add some additional parameters for 3D pixels
phase2TrackerDigitizer.Pixel3DDigitizerAlgorithm.NPColumnRadius = cms.double(4.0)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please do this inside the clone statement that defines Pixel3DDigitizerAlgorithm (L87 in this revision)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 1769b9f
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3e8404/10369/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-28-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31977/19466

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #31977 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @kpedro88, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 6e22721
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3e8404/10381/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-29-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3e8404/10381/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2544092
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2544069
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Oct 29, 2020

+1

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Oct 30, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 153e26d into cms-sw:master Oct 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants