-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Pixel 3D Digitizer] Include charge generation underneath the n-column #31977
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31977/19441
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31977/19445
|
A new Pull Request was created by @claralasa (Clara Lasaosa) for master. It involves the following packages: SimTracker/SiPhase2Digitizer @cmsbuild, @civanch, @kpedro88, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
float _np_column_radius; | ||
float _ohm_column_radius; | ||
// Radius of Column np and ohmic | ||
const float _np_column_radius; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code rule 2.14: '_' should not be used as first character http://cms-sw.github.io/cms_coding_rules.html
though this usage precedes this PR, it would be good to correct it here (for both the functions and the variables)
@@ -203,6 +203,11 @@ | |||
) | |||
) | |||
|
|||
# Add some additional parameters for 3D pixels | |||
phase2TrackerDigitizer.Pixel3DDigitizerAlgorithm.NPColumnRadius = cms.double(4.0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please do this inside the clone statement that defines Pixel3DDigitizerAlgorithm
(L87 in this revision)
+1 |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31977/19466
|
Pull request #31977 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @kpedro88, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again. |
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Improve 3D pixel digitization: include charge generation underneath the n-column in the 3D Pixel Digitizer, by allowing the n-column to penetrate to a certain extent.
In addition, fix some issues in the provisional validator (remember it is not part of this package and will probably be removed or migrated to the Validator package once the main development is done).
Conveners of the Upgrade Simulation group, @emiglior and @skinnari , are aware and agree.
cc: @duartej
PR validation:
Following PR instructions, a basic battery of tests was successfully run. Given that this PR is only affecting 3D pixels geometry (T23), some other tests were performed with workflows 30210.0, 30410.0, 30234.0 and 30434.0. The workflows 30410.0 and 30434.0, which include Pileup, fail launching the following error:
An exception of category 'NoSecondaryFiles' occurred while
[0] Constructing the EventProcessor
[1] Constructing module: class=MixingModule label='mix'
Exception Message:
RootEmbeddedFileSequence no input files specified for secondary input source.
Pileup files are not found in the expected repository, it is probably an issue with my config at lxplus... so I ignored it.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
It is not a backport