Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GE21 fix nstrips for 16 eta partition option #31225

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2020
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
29 changes: 29 additions & 0 deletions Geometry/GEMGeometryBuilder/data/v11/GEMSpecs.xml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<DDDefinition xmlns="http://www.cern.ch/cms/DDL" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.cern.ch/cms/DDL ../../../DetectorDescription/Schema/DDLSchema.xsd">
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<DDDefinition xmlns="http://www.cern.ch/cms/DDL" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.cern.ch/cms/DDL ../../../DetectorDescription/Schema/DDLSchema.xsd">
<DDDefinition>

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ianna Please confirm the long DDDefinition lines are not needed anymore.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shall I make this change?
Also, I copied and modified this from another version of the GEMSpecs, should we also update these to remove the schemas?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@watson-ij I think these schemas are obsolete and no longer needed. Please change them in this PR or a later one.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I'll make the changes in a new PR

<SpecParSection label="GEMSpecs.xml">
<SpecPar name="nStripsME0" eval="true">
<PartSelector path="//GHA0.."/>
<Parameter name="nStrips" value="384"/>
</SpecPar>
<SpecPar name="nStripsGE11" eval="true">
<PartSelector path="//GHA1.."/>
<Parameter name="nStrips" value="384"/>
</SpecPar>
<SpecPar name="nStripsGE21" eval="true">
<PartSelector path="//GHA2.."/>
<Parameter name="nStrips" value="384"/>
</SpecPar>
<SpecPar name="nPadsME0" eval="true">
<PartSelector path="//GHA0.."/>
<Parameter name="nPads" value="192"/>
</SpecPar>
<SpecPar name="nPadsGE11" eval="true">
<PartSelector path="//GHA1.."/>
<Parameter name="nPads" value="192"/>
</SpecPar>
<SpecPar name="nPadsGE21" eval="true">
<PartSelector path="//GHA2.."/>
<Parameter name="nPads" value="384"/>
</SpecPar>
</SpecParSection>
</DDDefinition>
22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions Geometry/GEMGeometryBuilder/data/v11/GEMSpecsFilter.xml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<DDDefinition xmlns="http://www.cern.ch/cms/DDL" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.cern.ch/cms/DDL ../../../DetectorDescription/Schema/DDLSchema.xsd">
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<DDDefinition xmlns="http://www.cern.ch/cms/DDL" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.cern.ch/cms/DDL ../../../DetectorDescription/Schema/DDLSchema.xsd">
<DDDefinition>

<SpecParSection label="GEMSpecsFilter.xml">
<SpecPar name="MuonME0Tree">
<PartSelector path="//ME0Box"/>
<PartSelector path="//ME0L"/>
<PartSelector path="//GHA0..*"/>
<Parameter name="MuStructure" value="MuonEndCapME0"/>
</SpecPar>
<SpecPar name="MuonGEMTree">
<PartSelector path="//GEMBox11L"/>
<PartSelector path="//GSAX11L"/>
<PartSelector path="//GEMBox11S"/>
<PartSelector path="//GSAX11S"/>
<PartSelector path="//GHA1..*"/>
<PartSelector path="//GEMBox21.*"/>
<PartSelector path="//GSAX21.*"/>
<PartSelector path="//GHA2..*"/>
<Parameter name="MuStructure" value="MuonEndCapGEM"/>
</SpecPar>
</SpecParSection>
</DDDefinition>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -111,8 +111,8 @@
'Geometry/CSCGeometryBuilder/data/cscSpecsFilter.xml',
'Geometry/CSCGeometryBuilder/data/cscSpecs.xml',
'Geometry/RPCGeometryBuilder/data/2026/v1/RPCSpecs.xml',
'Geometry/GEMGeometryBuilder/data/v7/GEMSpecsFilter.xml',
'Geometry/GEMGeometryBuilder/data/v7/GEMSpecs.xml',
'Geometry/GEMGeometryBuilder/data/v11/GEMSpecsFilter.xml',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right now this change is only put in this test file. Will this be propagated to any official detector configurations?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, Sundanda will make a workflow for the 16-partition GE2/1 geometry. But before he can do that, I need to update the GEM-CSC trigger, EMTF and GEM validation modules to temporarily reject those 16-partition GE2/1 trigger pads until the code is updated.

'Geometry/GEMGeometryBuilder/data/v11/GEMSpecs.xml',
'Geometry/ForwardCommonData/data/brmsens.xml',
'Geometry/ForwardSimData/data/zdcsens.xml',
'Geometry/MTDSimData/data/CrystalBarPhiFlat/mtdsens.xml',
Expand Down