Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explictly include root's TObjString header to fix the unit test for ROOT6 Ibs #29862

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 18, 2020

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This is needed due to headers cleanup in ROOT6 master branch ( see #29740 ). The unit test fails for root6 master based IBs [a]

[a]

Info in <TUnixSystem::ACLiC>: creating shared library CMSSW_11_1_ROOT6_X_2020-05-15-2300/tmp/PixelBaryCentreTool/PixelBaryCentrePlottingTools/./PlotMillePede
_C.so
In file included from input_line_12:6:
././PlotMillePede.C:410:76: error: unknown type name 'TObjString'
  if (whichOne.Contains("result", TString::kIgnoreCase)) whichOnes.Add(new TObjString("result"));
                                                                           ^
././PlotMillePede.C:411:76: error: unknown type name 'TObjString'
  if (whichOne.Contains("start",  TString::kIgnoreCase)) whichOnes.Add(new TObjString("start"));
                                                                           ^
././PlotMillePede.C:412:76: error: unknown type name 'TObjString'
  if (whichOne.Contains("diff",   TString::kIgnoreCase)) whichOnes.Add(new TObjString("diff"));

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the CMSSW_11_1_X milestone May 17, 2020
@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29862/15426

  • This PR adds an extra 8KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29862/15427

  • This PR adds an extra 8KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/MillePedeAlignmentAlgorithm

@cmsbuild, @pohsun, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @tlampen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mschrode, @mmusich, @adewit, @tocheng, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 17, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/6360/console Started: 2020/05/17 15:03

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 32d30fd
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f04848/6360/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-05-17-0000
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f04848/6360/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2694466
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2694414
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 150 log files, 16 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@pohsun
Copy link

pohsun commented May 18, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants