-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clean up BuildFiles under Utilities/ #29736
Conversation
@cmsbuild, please test |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29736/15136
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard (Andrea Bocci) for master. It involves the following packages: Utilities/BinningTools @smuzaffar, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @santocch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
ERROR: empty variable. PR had errors - #29736. |
@smuzaffar any idea what the error message is from? |
<flags NO_TESTRUN="1"/> | ||
</bin> | ||
<bin file="mkstemp.cpp" name="test_StorageFactory_Mkstemp"> | ||
</bin><bin file="local2.cpp" name="test_StorageFactory_Local2"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This does not look correct. @Dr15Jones
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! I'm guessing this is caused by the fact that BuildFile.xml
files in general are not actually fully XML conformant (i.e. XML requires one and only one top level node while the BuildFile.xml
format does not.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment says
we want to wait until the framework decides on a threading model to implement a fix
maybe it's obsolete ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment says
we want to wait until the framework decides on a threading model to implement a fix
maybe it's obsolete ?
The test was disabled in e09f0ac. @Dr15Jones Would you be able to tell if there is anything that would prevent the test to run?
Clean up BuildFile.xml filea with `xmllint --format`.
6155ca5
to
cf28ce8
Compare
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29736/15148
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Pull request #29736 was updated. @smuzaffar, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @santocch can you please check and sign again. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
merge |
+1 post-merge |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
Clean up BuildFile.xml filea with
xmllint --format
.