Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PUPPI in RECO #28659

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

  • Adding PUPPI weight to PFCandidate.
  • Adding AK4Puppi and AK8PFPuppi to RECO by default.
  • Removing AK8CHS.
  • Removing CMSTopTagger.

This will add two floats (standard and no-lep puppi) to PFCandidate. It becomes the "final" particleFlow module after linking. There are therefore now two "particleFlowTmp" objects (Tmp and Tmp2).

This is the first in an expected long sequence of follow-on PRs that will make use of PUPPI in RECO, simplifying many downstream workflows.

PR validation:

runTheMatrix.py -l limited

The expected PUPPI weights are present in the PFCandidates and are used (for now) only for ak4PFPuppi and ak8PFPuppi.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

No backports are planned.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28659/13224

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28659/13225

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @rappoccio for master.

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/PileupAlgos
DQM/Physics
DQMOffline/JetMET
DQMOffline/Trigger
DataFormats/ParticleFlowCandidate
DataFormats/PatCandidates
HLTriggerOffline/B2G
PhysicsTools/NanoAOD
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoBTag/Combined
RecoBTag/FeatureTools
RecoBTag/ImpactParameter
RecoBTag/ONNXRuntime
RecoHI/Configuration
RecoJets/Configuration
RecoJets/JetProducers
RecoParticleFlow/Configuration
RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer

@perrotta, @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fgolf, @fioriNTU, @slava77, @santocch, @peruzzim can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@emilbols, @gouskos, @yslai, @hatakeyamak, @echapon, @jazzitup, @peruzzim, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern, @calderona, @ahinzmann, @smoortga, @acaudron, @jhgoh, @lgray, @missirol, @HuguesBrun, @cericeci, @hqucms, @ferencek, @trocino, @yetkinyilmaz, @cbernet, @rovere, @jdamgov, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @mtosi, @dgulhan, @clelange, @HeinerTholen, @jdolen, @mandrenguyen, @riga, @battibass, @MiheeJo, @Fedespring, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @mverzett, @yenjie, @folguera, @kurtejung, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @rociovilar, @pvmulder, @andrzejnovak, @bachtis this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Dec 19, 2019

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 19, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/4068/console Started: 2019/12/19 22:47

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: b014641

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2019-12-19-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820
You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-acfbc8/4068/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests

  • Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test testTauEmbeddingProducers had ERRORS

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-acfbc8/4068/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 5657 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2811802
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 15587
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2795874
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -90.125 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): -3.633 KiB Physics/B2G
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): 0.027 KiB Physics/Exotica
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jan 24, 2020

-code-checks

@rappoccio
please apply the patch, in case you missed the message.
Thanks.

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

This is a kind reminder about this PR @rappoccio

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry for the delay, it's the first week of classes as I mentioned.

Please hold off on checks, cmsdev20 is full and my checks have not completed. I have to clean out the area and restart because something broke due to the disk being full.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28659/13560

  • This PR adds an extra 44KB to repository

  • There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #28659 was updated. @perrotta, @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fgolf, @fioriNTU, @slava77, @santocch, @peruzzim can you please check and sign again.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jan 31, 2020

Please hold off on checks, cmsdev20 is full and my checks have not completed. I have to clean out the area and restart because something broke due to the disk being full.

@rappoccio
please clarify if the PR checks are now done on your side.
Thank you.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Feb 1, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/4458/console Started: 2020/02/01 13:41

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2020

+1
Tested at: fbe06c1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-acfbc8/4458/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-02-01-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-acfbc8/4458/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 3064 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2695093
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5907
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2688840
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 346
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -90.125 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): -3.633 KiB Physics/B2G
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): 0.027 KiB Physics/Exotica
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, missed this earlier (last week was completely hectic). My tests passed. I don't know if there are other cases that need to be addressed. There is still an open question about what to do with the EGM and MUO value maps. @bendavid and @hatakeyamak have weighed in, perhaps we can discuss on Wednesday at the JME meeting?

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

@rappoccio Do you news about this PR after the JME meeting?

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes apparently we're killing this idea. The next circle of hell will come at a later time.

@rappoccio rappoccio closed this Feb 10, 2020
@ahinzmann ahinzmann mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants