-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PUPPI in RECO #28659
PUPPI in RECO #28659
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28659/13224
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28659/13225
|
A new Pull Request was created by @rappoccio for master. It involves the following packages: CommonTools/PileupAlgos @perrotta, @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fgolf, @fioriNTU, @slava77, @santocch, @peruzzim can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: b014641 CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2019-12-19-1100 I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: UnitTests
I found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test testTauEmbeddingProducers had ERRORS |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@rappoccio |
This is a kind reminder about this PR @rappoccio |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
Sorry for the delay, it's the first week of classes as I mentioned. Please hold off on checks, cmsdev20 is full and my checks have not completed. I have to clean out the area and restart because something broke due to the disk being full. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28659/13560
|
Pull request #28659 was updated. @perrotta, @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fgolf, @fioriNTU, @slava77, @santocch, @peruzzim can you please check and sign again. |
@rappoccio |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Sorry, missed this earlier (last week was completely hectic). My tests passed. I don't know if there are other cases that need to be addressed. There is still an open question about what to do with the EGM and MUO value maps. @bendavid and @hatakeyamak have weighed in, perhaps we can discuss on Wednesday at the JME meeting? |
@rappoccio Do you news about this PR after the JME meeting? |
Yes apparently we're killing this idea. The next circle of hell will come at a later time. |
PR description:
This will add two floats (standard and no-lep puppi) to PFCandidate. It becomes the "final" particleFlow module after linking. There are therefore now two "particleFlowTmp" objects (Tmp and Tmp2).
This is the first in an expected long sequence of follow-on PRs that will make use of PUPPI in RECO, simplifying many downstream workflows.
PR validation:
The expected PUPPI weights are present in the PFCandidates and are used (for now) only for ak4PFPuppi and ak8PFPuppi.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:
No backports are planned.