-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[10.6.X] Dynamical APV gain simulation (backport) #28160
[10.6.X] Dynamical APV gain simulation (backport) #28160
Conversation
including an ESSource, and EDAnalyzer to add to the database
Use SiStripApvSimulationParameters from EventSetup in SiStripDigitizer Use SiStrip APV simulation baseline ascii files from SimTracker/SiStripDigitizer/data SiStripDIgitizerAlgorithm: use enum for tracker partitions Address PR comments. Make output collections unique_ptr from start Use emplace_back instead of push_back. Reserve size for vectors holding output collections if known Fix creation of output containers Reorganise new class members Fix to avoid potentially negative charge deposits after simulating APV gain.
…ore bool with decision.
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_10_6_X. It involves the following packages: CalibTracker/SiStripESProducers @civanch, @christopheralanwest, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @tocheng, @tlampen, @ggovi, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_6_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@fabiocos @srimanob can you clarify the intended trajectory of this PR (fully signed since 1 month)? To complete the backport of the APV simulation we need to add the combined commits of #28355 and #28454. |
+1 |
@mmusich this PR was waiting for a validation and a decision about its backport, that we now have, in this sense being signed does not imply any automatic integration. |
@fabiocos, thanks! |
PR description:
Combined back-port of:
PR validation:
Validated by cherry-picking commits from PRs #28024 introducing special testing wfs in master
it run to completion.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:
#27823, #27941, #28028, #28081
cc:
@EmyrClement @pieterdavid @robervalwalsh @tsusa @mtosi @JanFSchulte