-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DBG_X] Multiple relvals failing due to "looking for SiStripNoises for a strip out of range: strip 0" #46250
Comments
assign reconstruction |
New categories assigned: reconstruction @jfernan2,@mandrenguyen you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
cms-bot internal usage |
A new Issue was created by @iarspider. @Dr15Jones, @antoniovilela, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
this in all likelihood is coming from the GT updates in #46184 |
assign simulation, alca |
unassign reconstruction MixingModule is not part of reconstruction |
@cms-sw/alca-l2 @cms-sw/simulation-l2 This is still happening - see e.g. 11601.0
|
More likely #46124, which included the latest GT updates for 2022MC used in 11601.0 (even though the @iarspider , maybe a naive question: the fact that it only shows up in the DBG_X builds couldn't point out to some wrong memory management in some Debug part of the code? |
Nope: cmssw/CondFormats/SiStripObjects/interface/SiStripNoises.h Lines 72 to 77 in 6da1102
cmssw/CondFormats/SiStripObjects/src/SiStripNoises.cc Lines 61 to 65 in 6da1102
|
comparing the two versions of the GTs updated in PR #46124, I see:
IF |
Thank you @mmusich Then the message points out to some range where If we want to search the origin of it in the GT update, then the tag for |
again no. This is just a utility to fix the payloads exactly for these use cases (making sure that the noise and bad components are covering the same sets of strips). |
this is exactly the content of #46250 (comment) I guess messages crossing... |
Something looks very wrong with see difference w.r.t the previous tag @perrotta @cms-sw/alca-l2 why was this payload admitted to the queue? |
As far as I understand #46379 will fix this issue. |
Looks like #46379 (as expected) fixed the problem, see e.g. log of wf11601.0 in |
@cmsbuild please close |
In CMSSW_14_2_DBG_X_2024-10-03-2300, multiple RelVals failed with
Full log: link
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: